[dev] [st] Mouse usage in Vim

2011-05-09 Thread Jonathan Slark
Hi, I use a version of Vim compiled with X11 support. When running vim under urxvt I can use the mouse for Visual Mode etc. This doesn't work for me under st. I tried using "TERM=xterm vim" but that didn't help. Is this something that would be added when the xterm compliance feature is i

RE: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution

2011-05-09 Thread Wolf Tivy
> i really like dillo because it is fast, but i would really like to > control it like surf ... > > so i would propose to use neither fltk nor gtk for a dillo gui. Agree. However, I think you still need some kind of widget madnes for html forms. Too bad most of the web requires javasuck these da

Re: [dev] Why dwm or wmii over xmonad, etc., or not?

2011-05-09 Thread dtk
Excerpts from Nathan Neff's message of Mo Mai 09 23:17:44 +0200 2011: > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:57 AM, Aurélien Aptel > wrote: > > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Nathan Neff wrote: > >> 2.5) Easy / sensible defaults.  Sorry but Emacs-style "shortcut keys" > >> are an oxymoron.  Any window mana

Re: [dev] Why dwm or wmii over xmonad, etc., or not?

2011-05-09 Thread Nathan Neff
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:57 AM, Aurélien Aptel wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Nathan Neff wrote: >> 2.5) Easy / sensible defaults.  Sorry but Emacs-style "shortcut keys" >> are an oxymoron.  Any window manager >> that uses Emacs "Key Chords" is immediately disqualified.  With wmii you

Re: [dev] Tabbed unmaintained?

2011-05-09 Thread u
evening' On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 09:04:07PM +0200, ilf wrote: > On 05-06 22:46, u...@netbeisser.de wrote: > >1 Oettinger is on the way. > Oettinger? SRSLY? zes, different brands at the Linux Tag 2011. nash

Re: [dev] Tabbed unmaintained?

2011-05-09 Thread ilf
On 05-06 22:46, u...@netbeisser.de wrote: 1 Oettinger is on the way. Öttinger? SRSLY? -- ilf Über 80 Millionen Deutsche benutzen keine Konsole. Klick dich nicht weg! -- Eine Initiative des Bundesamtes für Tastaturbenutzung signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution

2011-05-09 Thread Yoshi Rokuko
+ hiro ---+ > > About dillo again: last time I talked about fltk everyone here wanted > to kill me and I had to change my phone number. Is this just because > of C++ or are there other reasons I've overseen? > i really like dillo becaus

Re: [dev] dwm

2011-05-09 Thread Connor Lane Smith
On 7 May 2011 19:43, David Neu wrote: > I've been using dwm for years, it sounds like I haven't been *fully* > using it, i.e. I haven't been making use of the ability to assign > multiple tags to a single client.  Can you give me an example how you > use this? I normally use tags as though they w

Re: [dev] dwm

2011-05-09 Thread David Neu
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:15 AM, Petr Sabata wrote: > On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 02:43:49PM -0400, David Neu wrote: >> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote: >> > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:26 AM, wrote: >> >> >> >> hm well that should be main-features of a dynamic-window-manager and >>

Re: [dev] dwm

2011-05-09 Thread Petr Sabata
On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 02:43:49PM -0400, David Neu wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote: > > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:26 AM, wrote: > >> > >> hm well that should be main-features of a dynamic-window-manager and > >> not just available pver a "patch"..these were some of th

Re: [dev] dwm

2011-05-09 Thread Petr Sabata
On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 02:48:24PM +0200, v4hn wrote: > On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 03:33:51PM +0200, Petr Sabata wrote: > > On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 03:26:11PM +0200, m1...@web.de wrote: > > > [huge pile of crap] > > > > Oh that hurts... > > You did _not_ try to read this, did ya? I spent like a hal