On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Aurélien Aptel
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Bjartur Thorlacius
> wrote:
>> While I believe we need a simple text UIO widget that doesn't
>> interpret terminal escapes et cetera, I can't see why the shell should
>> even be awere of user keystrokes. Or
I'm not sure if it's my phone, but that font looks like braille.
On Apr 22, 2011 3:51 PM, "Suraj Kurapati" wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Tom Kazimiers
> wrote:
>>> (screenshot: http://ompldr.org/vODNuag)
>>
>> You seem to use a nice (anti aliased) font. Out of curiosity: Can
>> you p
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Tom Kazimiers
wrote:
>> (screenshot: http://ompldr.org/vODNuag)
>
> You seem to use a nice (anti aliased) font. Out of curiosity: Can
> you please tell me what it is? Thanks.
The font is Tamsyn at 12pt/8x17r (I use 11pt/8x15r now, however):
http://www.fial.com/~s
If you have a vim-like interface to Chrome, the best way to edit text
online is jsvi[0]. It need some improvement but works quite good. OTOH,
Chrome will *never* allow the extensions to run local binary code like
FireFox does. You'll have to use the NPAPI plugin to achieve this goal.
Regards,
Clau
> (screenshot: http://ompldr.org/vODNuag)
You seem to use a nice (anti aliased) font. Out of curiosity: Can you
please tell me what it is? Thanks.
Cheers,
Tom
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Ethan Grammatikidis
wrote:
> I thought I did. 10+ years ago I really felt extreme configurability was
> absolutely vital to getting comfortable at all.
I don't need it permanently; I'm new to tiling window managers, and
wmii makes it easy to experiment with new st
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Bjartur Thorlacius
wrote:
> While I believe we need a simple text UIO widget that doesn't
> interpret terminal escapes et cetera, I can't see why the shell should
> even be awere of user keystrokes. Or are you suggesting something like
> rlwrap read | rc?
It's jus
On 19 Apr 2011, at 8:57 pm, Andrew Hills wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Jan wrote:
meh, that sucks. i guess you already tried the radeon driver?
Yes, but the radeon driver doesn't support my card. I will try
physically swapping the outputs; after that, I'll quit complaining.
I'm
On 20 Apr 2011, at 7:20 pm, Andrew Hills wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Kurt H Maier
wrote:
If a program requires endless configuration, it's a bad program.
The program doesn't require it; I do.
I thought I did. 10+ years ago I really felt extreme configurability
was absolutel
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Claudio wrote:
> Line buffer editing/positioning shouldn't be handled by st itself, it
> should be delegated to an external tools (most likely the shell). Else
> none of ^e, ^a, and such keystrokes should be available/hardcoded into
> the terminal emulator. We shou
10 matches
Mail list logo
