Re: [dev] libixp-hg and gnu make 3.82 build failed

2011-02-05 Thread Kris Maglione
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 06:47:19AM +0300, lionmv wrote: Building of libixp, pulled from hg failed with gnu make. mk/hdr.mk:48 *** missing separator. Stop. BINSH := $(shell \    if [ -x /bin/dash ]; then echo /bin/dash; \    elif [ -x /bin/ksh ]; then echo /bin/ksh; \    

[dev] libixp-hg and gnu make 3.82 build failed

2011-02-05 Thread lionmv
Building of libixp, pulled from hg failed with gnu make. mk/hdr.mk:48 *** missing separator. Stop. BINSH := $(shell \    if [ -x /bin/dash ]; then echo /bin/dash; \    elif [ -x /bin/ksh ]; then echo /bin/ksh; \    else echo /bin/sh; fi) BINSH != echo /bin/sh #<= line4

Re: [dev] [quark] patch

2011-02-05 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
* Bjartur Thorlacius [2011-02-05 22:59:02 +]: > As you don't need compatibility with browsers, you should be using a > HTTP header starting with If-. See > http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec13.html thanks for reminding me these i discarded if- headers because they have different

Re: [dev] A Suckless Filesystem

2011-02-05 Thread Antoni Grzymala
w...@tivy.com dixit (2011-02-05, 16:20): > >Which one do you use? Why do you use it? What does it have that the > >others don't? > > ext2. I forget why. Probably because I didn't know anything when I > installed archlinux. > > I've heard good things about JFS. I've looked at the different FS's b

RE: [dev] A Suckless Filesystem

2011-02-05 Thread wolf
>Which one do you use? Why do you use it? What does it have that the >others don't? ext2. I forget why. Probably because I didn't know anything when I installed archlinux. I've heard good things about JFS. I've looked at the different FS's but I can't really identify one as being obviously suckle

Re: [dev] [quark] patch

2011-02-05 Thread Bjartur Thorlacius
On 2/5/11, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > you are right the uri spec does not allow it so lets go with '?' > or '/' or '.' or.. i'll use something when i get there As you don't need compatibility with browsers, you should be using a HTTP header starting with If-. See http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rf

[dev] A Suckless Filesystem

2011-02-05 Thread Brandon LaRocque
Which one do you use? Why do you use it? What does it have that the others don't?

Re: [dev] [quark] patch

2011-02-05 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
* Robert Ransom [2011-02-05 05:35:29 -0800]: > Yes it is. See RFC 2616 (section 5.1.2) and RFC 3986 (section 4). > you are right the uri spec does not allow it so lets go with '?' or '/' or '.' or.. i'll use something when i get there > If you expect groups of servers to be disconnected for ext

Re: [dev] [quark] patch

2011-02-05 Thread Robert Ransom
On Sat, 5 Feb 2011 13:45:07 +0100 Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > * Robert Ransom [2011-02-04 18:56:48 -0800]: > > > -> GET /key#hash-of-data HTTP/1.0\r\n\r\n > > > <- [waiting..] > > > > The server will never see the fragment identifier (the "#" and text > > following it). > > there is no such restric

Re: [dev] [quark] patch

2011-02-05 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
* Robert Ransom [2011-02-04 18:56:48 -0800]: > > -> GET /key#hash-of-data HTTP/1.0\r\n\r\n > > <- [waiting..] > > The server will never see the fragment identifier (the "#" and text > following it). there is no such restriction in http nor in urls (it's not a reserved character) your browser st