On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:03:03 -0800, Gene Auyeung
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Jan wrote:
>> Since your new to dwm I'd like to point you to the bstack layouts you
can
>> find in the wiki. In my eyes they work very nice with netbooks.
>
> I don't have a netbook or even a widescreen.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Jan wrote:
> Since your new to dwm I'd like to point you to the bstack layouts you can
> find in the wiki. In my eyes they work very nice with netbooks.
I don't have a netbook or even a widescreen. So I was just wondering
why further reducing an already small vert
Well, it looks better...
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 01:51:32 +, Nick wrote:
> As I mostly use monocle layout (I'm using a netbook), this behaviour
> isn't ideal for me. Attached is a patch removing that functionality,
> in case anyone else finds it useful.
Since your new to dwm I'd like to point you to the bstack layouts
Quoth TJ Robotham:
> Basically, when a client is first created dwm checks to see if its dimensions
> are the same as that of the monitor it's on. If so then the window is set to
> floating. This logic appears after applying any rules, a rule explicitly
> setting the window to be non-floating will
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 01:14:17AM +, Nick wrote:
> I like using fullscreen mplayer, and being able to switch between
> different windows in monocle mode. However, if mplayer is set to
> fullscreen (-fs), when I use the next/previous window key commands,
> mplayer stays shown (though the key
Hi list,
I'm quite new to dwm, so apologies if I'm missing something.
I like using fullscreen mplayer, and being able to switch between
different windows in monocle mode. However, if mplayer is set to
fullscreen (-fs), when I use the next/previous window key commands,
mplayer stays shown (thou
Excerpts from carmen's message of Sun Jan 23 02:35:36 +0100 2011:
> minimalist clientside filtering tools exist, eg a 46 line replacement for the
> ~600K of code Simile Exhibit project:
> http://blog.whats-your.name/public/logex.png
Question: Why is your screen-content upside-down and mirrored?
B
On 01/24/2011 10:44 PM, dtk wrote:
> On 01/23/2011 10:21 PM, Kris Maglione wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 05:26:30PM +0100, dtk wrote:
>>> On 01/14/2011 04:52 PM, Kris Maglione wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 04:13:34PM +0100, dtk wrote:
> Running wireshark as my default non-priviledged
On 01/24/2011 10:44 PM, dtk wrote:
> On 01/23/2011 10:21 PM, Kris Maglione wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 05:26:30PM +0100, dtk wrote:
>>> On 01/14/2011 04:52 PM, Kris Maglione wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 04:13:34PM +0100, dtk wrote:
> Running wireshark as my default non-priviledged
On 01/23/2011 10:21 PM, Kris Maglione wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 05:26:30PM +0100, dtk wrote:
>> On 01/14/2011 04:52 PM, Kris Maglione wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 04:13:34PM +0100, dtk wrote:
Running wireshark as my default non-priviledged user works fine, as
does
runnin
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Ross Mohn wrote:
>
> Scrollback buffer is also useful with SIGWINCH. Let's say you're in
> dwm's default tiling mode with a screenful of output on the left-hand st
> and 4 st's stacked up on the right; you swap, then swap back and you've
> lost 75% of the output on
You should probably draw on the root window, rather than try to create
a new floating and borderless one.
On 1/24/11, loz.accs wrote:
> Hi all, I've got a problem with urxvt terminal emulator, there is a
> way to make urxvt behavior like background wallpaper on desktop. I
> mean without borders a
Hey all,
Just thought I'd throw this out here in case anyone's interested. In
modern Linux you can use FUSE to make a Plan 9-style union filesystem,
which means you can actually get rid of dmenu_path completely. (Thanks
to __20h__ in #suckless for this idea.)
$ sudo apt-get install unionfs-fuse #
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Eitan Goldshtrom wrote:
I've been told that Ubuntu might not be the best choice for running wmii. I
really only did it because at the time, and still really, I was only familiar
with
Ubuntu and didn't/don't have the time to familiarize myself with how to get
around anot
Re wmii on Ubuntu:
https://launchpad.net/~maglione-k/+archive/ppa
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 08:07:50AM -0500, Eitan Goldshtrom wrote:
I've been told that Ubuntu might not be the best choice for running
wmii. I really only did it because at the time, and still really, I was
only familiar with U
I've been told that Ubuntu might not be the best choice for running
wmii. I really only did it because at the time, and still really, I was
only familiar with Ubuntu and didn't/don't have the time to familiarize
myself with how to get around another linux distro -- I'm a thesising
college stude
17 matches
Mail list logo
