Re: [dev] [sic][patch] fixes and questions.

2010-10-09 Thread Robert Ransom
On Sat, 09 Oct 2010 21:35:55 -0700 Wolf Tivy wrote: > Ok, it works if I make the port 6667, which is also not in my /etc/services. > Should port just be 6667 instead of mucking around with symbolic port > resolution? Yes. Robert Ransom signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [dev] [sic][patch] fixes and questions.

2010-10-09 Thread Wolf Tivy
Ok, it works if I make the port 6667, which is also not in my /etc/services. Should port just be 6667 instead of mucking around with symbolic port resolution? - Original Message - From: Wolf Tivy Date: Saturday, October 9, 2010 9:27 pm Subject: [dev] [sic][patch] fixes and questions. To:

[dev] [sic][patch] fixes and questions.

2010-10-09 Thread Wolf Tivy
Hello! some fixes for sic attached. story below. sic was saying "error: cannot resolve hostname : Success" so I went to the source. The Success was because the code was written assuming the failure would set errno, but it didn't. I fixed it to print out the right error message, but make wouldn't

Re: [dev] polipo with surf

2010-10-09 Thread Jacob Todd
On slow connections i noticed a small improvement. I don't remember exactly what i had to to in order for it to work. It was discussex on the list before hough.

[dev] polipo with surf

2010-10-09 Thread Mitchell Church
Has anyone experienced a speed increase using polipo caching proxy in conjunction with surf? I mean, the browser is pretty fast already, but polipo config is simple enough. To make it talk to surf do I merely do a #define http_proxy in config.h? Thanks. Also, I'm still trying to figure out ho

Re: [dev] surf recompile

2010-10-09 Thread MItchell Church
Oh thanks a bunch! I also have one other question, I apologize for the newbie questions for compiling this application. I've boned up on mercurial and now I can rebuild with changes to config.h working as expected, but I still don't know how to add in scripts. For example, the instructions for t

Re: [dev] surf recompile

2010-10-09 Thread Rob
> Is it possible to do a persistant modkey in Surf?  Functionally I guess it > would be the equivalent of an "insert" mode.  You hit the modkey once then > you can use the typical j,k, g etc. to browse, then if you need to type text > you hit the mod again to go into standard mode.  Plenty of other

[dev] [st] xclipboard support patch

2010-10-09 Thread federico luna
hi st users, here is a patch to support xclipboard st. the code was extracted and adapted from x11.c of qemacs. please try and if there is something to change, Iet me know. pd: Aurélien, thanks for accepting my previous patch. pd2: sorry my bad english. saludos -f # HG changeset patch # User fl

Re: [dev] surf recompile

2010-10-09 Thread MItchell Church
Thanks. I have gotten this issue worked out now. Is it possible to do a persistant modkey in Surf? Functionally I guess it would be the equivalent of an "insert" mode. You hit the modkey once then you can use the typical j,k, g etc. to browse, then if you need to type text you hit the mod again

[dev] sta.li progress

2010-10-09 Thread Wolf Tivy
I've been interested in sta.li for a while but luck has been against me. surf leaks memory or something at maximum speed when I visit the elevenislouder link on the sta.li website, and hg hangs trying to clone hg.suckless.org/stali-toolchain. Furthermore, the hg repository hasn't been touched in 7

Re: [dev] static bionic libc ...

2010-10-09 Thread pancake
Metasploit also distributes a copy of bionic with some patches in order to compile multistage shellcodes without libc dependencies. I would love to have a fork of bionic in the suckless repo with mk or makefiles.. I always find anoying the android.mk ..unless we do a replacement to use android.m

Re: [dev] static bionic libc ...

2010-10-09 Thread Jens Staal
no ofcourse not :) I just got this association in my head and thought it was so cool so I wanted to share it with someone (hence the "sorry if this came out as a brainfart" post scriptum) 2010/10/9 Adrian : > Because the most important thing about a libc is the name... > >

Re: [dev] static bionic libc ...

2010-10-09 Thread Adrian
Because the most important thing about a libc is the name...

[dev] static bionic libc ...

2010-10-09 Thread Jens Staal
Dear list As far as I have understood (http://suckless.org/project_ideas) and idea has been to use bionic as static libc in the Sta.li distribution. However, it seems like this libc is relatively closely attached to the Android SDK/NDK (http://codingrelic.geekhold.com/2008/11/six-million-dollar-li

Re: [dev] surf recompile

2010-10-09 Thread MItchell Church
Thank you. I had been trying to work through the instructions in the read me and doing a make clean install. This worked fine when I took the time to actually clone the mercurial repository and work through mercurial. For some reason I couldn't get this working with the AUR package. I think it

Re: [dev] surf recompile

2010-10-09 Thread Pierre Chapuis
On Sat, 09 Oct 2010 09:44:31 +0400, Ramil Farkhshatov wrote: Mitchell Church wrote: 1. Download package from AUR. It consists of PKGBUILD and config.def.h 2. Edit config.def.h 3. Run makepkg -g >> PKGBUILD to update config.def.h checksum. 4. Run makepkg to build package. Yep, that's the w