> Can you explain what could go wrong? The predicate would
> be passed in
> the KeyRelease event (as an XPointer), and return True if it finds
> a KeyPress with matching time and keycode.
Sorry, there is no problem. I didn't quite grasp the arbitrary predicate
part before.
I am skeptical about w
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 05:41:24PM -0700, Wolf Tivy wrote:
> > In particular, XCheckIfEvent seems well suited to this situation-
> > -feed in a predicate which specifically finds the repeated KeyPress
> > (matches time, key, etc.). But this can perform unnecessary
> > computation since it checks th
> > There are various functions I think you could use. apropos XCheck?
>
> In particular, XCheckIfEvent seems well suited to this situation-
> -feed
> in a predicate which specifically finds the repeated KeyPress (matches
> time, key, etc.). But this can perform unnecessary computation
> since it
2010/9/23 Wolf Tivy :
> If someone can elaborate on the motivation and use-cases for the toggle,
> I might be better able to give it the right semantics with the combo stuff.
> From my understanding it's no longer necessary as it was simply a
> mechanism to cache your tagset which was microtedious
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:44:46PM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Wednesday, 22 September 2010, Wolf Tivy wrote:
> > I wasn't just being cheap when I left that out. It looks like XPeekEvent
> > blocks, which won't do. I haven't found the (hopefully existent)
> > non-blocking equiva
Hey,
On Wednesday, 22 September 2010, Wolf Tivy wrote:
> I wasn't just being cheap when I left that out. It looks like XPeekEvent
> blocks, which won't do. I haven't found the (hopefully existent)
> non-blocking equivalent, so I can't even write that part.
There are various functions I think you
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 03:00:53PM -0700, Wolf Tivy wrote:
> I wasn't just being cheap when I left that out. It looks like
> XPeekEvent blocks, which won't do. I haven't found the (hopefully
> existent) non-blocking equivalent, so I can't even write that part.
Okay, I feel like a moron: I had no i
> I suppose your goal was code economy, so maybe you don't care,
> but: by
> not adding the code to deal with repeats, you're forcing the resulting
> release/press pairs to be handled by the toplevel event loop, one
> undoing the effect of the other.
>
> Visually though it shouldn't be an issue:
I suppose your goal was code economy, so maybe you don't care, but: by
not adding the code to deal with repeats, you're forcing the resulting
release/press pairs to be handled by the toplevel event loop, one
undoing the effect of the other.
Visually though it shouldn't be an issue: like I said, I
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:42:43 -0700
Wolf Tivy wrote:
> > hey,
> >
> > sounds quite interesting, but what's wrong with a simple
> > diff-file instead of instructions where to insert c-code? -.-
> >
> >
> > v4hn
>
> A diff would be better, but my dwm has some other crap, and I
> don't have the u
> By the previous tags I mean the other tagset. It can be toggled with
> view(0), MODKEY+Tab by default. If you want to add that functionality
> to your patch add
>
> selmon->seltags ^= 1; /* toggle sel tagset */
>
> before
>
> selmon->tagset[selmon->seltags] = newtags;
>
> It will pro
> hey,
>
> sounds quite interesting, but what's wrong with a simple
> diff-file instead of instructions where to insert c-code? -.-
>
>
> v4hn
A diff would be better, but my dwm has some other crap, and I
don't have the unmodified, and those are just excuses for the
fact that i don't know how t
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:19:55PM -0700, Wolf Tivy wrote:
> Ok so I'm done my little mods, works great. I have attached
> a 'patch' so that the rest of you can play with it.
> Some possible breakage is that the new view function
> doesn't toggle between the two tag sets. Still works for me
> thoug
2010/9/22 Wolf Tivy :
> Sorry for being unclear. Not quite like toggle. I mean when you press a
> tag key it does the normal thing (tags = newtag or whatever), but then
> if you press more tag keys before you release any of them it adds them
> to the selection (like tags |= newtag). So if you mash
14 matches
Mail list logo
