Re: [dev] [dwm] number of tag limited?

2010-08-05 Thread Simon Parent
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:27 AM, thuban wrote: >> >> I just changed the colour scheme in drawbar() so that unoccupied tags >> are invisible (by making the text colour the same as the background). >> This was enough for me, as I was mostly concerned with the visual >> noise of all the unoccupied tag

Re: [dev] [dwm] number of tag limited?

2010-08-05 Thread thuban
> > I just changed the colour scheme in drawbar() so that unoccupied tags > are invisible (by making the text colour the same as the background). > This was enough for me, as I was mostly concerned with the visual > noise of all the unoccupied tags. > > The unoccupied tags aren't completely usele

Re: [dev] [dwm] number of tag limited?

2010-08-05 Thread TJ Robotham
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:50:13PM +0200, thuban wrote: > However, I'm surprised that this is not the default use of dwm. It is > supposed to be suckless, and on my own, I think having "opened tags" > that are useless (meaning with no window inside) sucks at least a > little. Except that open empt

Re: [dev] [dwm] number of tag limited?

2010-08-05 Thread Simon Parent
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 4:50 PM, thuban wrote: > Le Thu, 5 Aug 2010 18:59:29 +0200, > yy a écrit : > >> 2010/8/5 thuban : >> > Just a question about dwm, is it possible to have more than 9 tag? >> >> You can define as many tags as you want in your config.h file. >> >> > My question is, could you c

Re: [dev] [dwm] number of tag limited?

2010-08-05 Thread thuban
Le Thu, 5 Aug 2010 18:59:29 +0200, yy a écrit : > 2010/8/5 thuban : > > Just a question about dwm, is it possible to have more than 9 tag? > > You can define as many tags as you want in your config.h file. > > > My question is, could you create tags only if they are needed (a > > window moved i

Re: [dev] [dwm] number of tag limited?

2010-08-05 Thread Donald Allen
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Christoph Schied wrote: > On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 06:59:29PM +0200, yy wrote: >> You can define as many tags as you want in your config.h file. > > thats actually not true: > struct NumTags { char limitexceeded[LENGTH(tags) > 31 ? -1 : 1]; }; To the original poster

Re: [dev] curses samterm

2010-08-05 Thread Connor Lane Smith
On 4 August 2010 05:13, Wolf Tivy wrote: > > Sounds like vi. > except with a clean command set and less legacy baggage. And structural regular expressions, and less modality, and sam networking. It sounds like vi in the sense that yes, it edits text. Regarding the command input, imo there should

Re: [dev] [dwm] number of tag limited?

2010-08-05 Thread Christoph Schied
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 06:59:29PM +0200, yy wrote: > You can define as many tags as you want in your config.h file. thats actually not true: struct NumTags { char limitexceeded[LENGTH(tags) > 31 ? -1 : 1]; };

Re: [dev] [dwm] number of tag limited?

2010-08-05 Thread yy
2010/8/5 thuban : > Just a question about dwm, is it possible to have more than 9 tag? You can define as many tags as you want in your config.h file. > My question is, could you create tags only if they are needed (a window > moved in, on drawn in), just like in wmii. I already had written this >

[dev] [dwm] number of tag limited?

2010-08-05 Thread thuban
Just a question about dwm, is it possible to have more than 9 tag? I was wondering too, if sometimes we can need 5 tags, another time, we could only need 1 tag (if you just want to check your e-mails as example). So, the other tags aren't useful at this moment. My question is, could you create ta