I realized earlier that my patch has a compile error in it - I renamed a
file and then diffed without changing an include in the header file.
Anyway, this one should work.
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Niki Yoshiuchi wrote:
> The biggest benefit I've found has simply been that the second clien
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 10:56:34PM +0200, Pierre Chapuis wrote:
I installed surf 0.4 on Arch Linux and it crashed when I tried to click
on a link to a binary file (actually to its own archive on suckless'
website). Downloading with the right click menu works fine.
I have copied its output below.
Pierre Chapuis writes:
> I installed surf 0.4 on Arch Linux and it crashed when I tried to click
> on a link to a binary file (actually to its own archive on suckless'
> website). Downloading with the right click menu works fine.
>
> I have copied its output below. The crash looks linked to Java.
I installed surf 0.4 on Arch Linux and it crashed when I tried to click
on a link to a binary file (actually to its own archive on suckless'
website). Downloading with the right click menu works fine.
I have copied its output below. The crash looks linked to Java.
*** glibc detected *** sur
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 10:11:59PM +0200, pascal wrote:
Thanks for the wmiirc_local.py example. I used it as a base for
mine. I'm having some troubles to figure out the "mixer"
plugin. I thought I would try to write an equivalent myself
before asking, but I can't, I'm getting headaches. Would
Hi Kris
Thanks for the wmiirc_local.py example. I used it as a base for mine.
I'm having some troubles to figure out the "mixer" plugin. I thought I would try
to write an equivalent myself before asking, but I can't, I'm getting headaches.
Would you mind posting yours?
Pascal
I noticed that when using tabbed (with either surf or xterm), that if
the window is focused with the mouse over another window, I am able to
send keystrokes to tabbed (next/previous tab, for example), but am not
able to send keystrokes so the surf or xterm window. I have to manually
move my mouse
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 01:56:28PM +0200, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 01:27:07PM +0200, Mate Nagy wrote:
> > > Using the vim splits may be cheating, but it sure is convenient.
> > sorry for self-reply: I thought that maybe for maximum punishment, the
> > fibonacci layout coul
While we're on macros, I use the following macro for each tag,
so I can spawn an xterm wherever I want, in what mode I want,
just by setting its class, e.g.
$ xterm -class XTerm4f
spawns a floating xterm on tag 4 (1-based indexing)
#define TAG(i) (1 << (i-1))
#define XTERM(n) \
{ "XTerm"#n
On 13:56 Tue 01 Jun, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 01:27:07PM +0200, Mate Nagy wrote:
>> > Using the vim splits may be cheating, but it sure is convenient.
>> sorry for self-reply: I thought that maybe for maximum punishment, the
>> fibonacci layout could support nmaster. (Also
On 1 Jun 2010, at 14:01, Martin Kopta wrote:
Few months ago I set my
$HOME as read only and removed dotfiles and dotdirs what I didn't
create myself
or explicitly want.
Oh! This is something I should have done many years ago. I wish
I'd thought of it. I've lost good data because ther
The biggest benefit I've found has simply been that the second client
remains the same size regardless of how many clients you have open. That
said, I am generally using dwm on a netbook so I rarely have more than 2 or
3 clients open on a single tag.
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:18 AM, wrote:
> > I
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 01:27:07PM +0200, Mate Nagy wrote:
>> > Using the vim splits may be cheating, but it sure is convenient.
>> sorry for self-reply: I thought that maybe for maximum punishment, the
>> fibonacci layout could support nm
On 1 Jun 2010, at 12:56, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote:
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 01:27:07PM +0200, Mate Nagy wrote:
Using the vim splits may be cheating, but it sure is convenient.
sorry for self-reply: I thought that maybe for maximum punishment,
the
fibonacci layout could support nmaster. (Also no
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 01:56:28PM +0200, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote:
> Actually tiling doesn't even make much sense on it, when I went with monocle
> on
> the netbook I grew used to it and use it everywhere now.
> Anyone else interested in sharing their way how they use their System? It
> seems
> lik
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 01:27:07PM +0200, Mate Nagy wrote:
> > Using the vim splits may be cheating, but it sure is convenient.
> sorry for self-reply: I thought that maybe for maximum punishment, the
> fibonacci layout could support nmaster. (Also note that this is a
> 2560x1600 setup, that's wh
[2010-06-01 13:34] Mate Nagy
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 01:27:07PM +0200, Mate Nagy wrote:
> > Using the vim splits may be cheating, but it sure is convenient.
> sorry for self-reply: I thought that maybe for maximum punishment, the
> fibonacci layout could support nmaster. (Also note that this is
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 01:27:07PM +0200, Mate Nagy wrote:
> Using the vim splits may be cheating, but it sure is convenient.
sorry for self-reply: I thought that maybe for maximum punishment, the
fibonacci layout could support nmaster. (Also note that this is a
2560x1600 setup, that's why so much
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 01:18:35PM +0200, c...@wzff.de wrote:
> Do these layouts provide any benefits? I found them rather useless actually,
> even in dwm... What do you use them for, and in what way do you use them if
> you don't mind sharing your experience?
I just tried the fibonacci (dwindle)
> I've been using dvtm at work a lot recently so I figured I'd port the
> Fibonacci spiral/dwindle layouts to dvtm. This patch is for 0.5.2. I find
> it's not as useful as the Fibonacci layouts in dwm but I figure why not
> release it anyway.
>
> -Niki Yoshiuchi
Do these layouts provide any ben
20 matches
Mail list logo
