Re: [dev] SWK: The simple widget kit

2010-05-13 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:02:47AM +0200, pancake wrote: > Is simpler to just change a pointer. We can make global. I will do the > change tomorrow. I will review the current state today and provide my comments in detail. Cheers, Anselm

Re: [dev] SWK: The simple widget kit

2010-05-13 Thread pancake
Is simpler to just change a pointer. We can make global. I will do the change tomorrow. Thanks On May 13, 2010, at 8:31 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: On 5/13/10, pancake wrote: Check t/ui.c and you will understand why SwkWindow is not global variable. Do somebody noticed this file? I mean..

Re: [dev] SWK: The simple widget kit

2010-05-13 Thread Steen Engholm
I'm curious . On 5/13/10, pancake wrote: > On 05/13/10 11:29, Anselm R Garbe wrote: >> On 13 May 2010 10:04, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: >> >>> On 5/12/10, Rory Rory wrote: >>> Right now it's not obvious what the widgets actually are. The textboxes look identical to the buttons and it's har

Re: [dev] SWK: The simple widget kit

2010-05-13 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
On 5/13/10, pancake wrote: > Check t/ui.c and you will understand why SwkWindow is not global variable. > > Do somebody noticed this file? I mean..the UI can be done not only by code.. i've noticed that can't you just manipulate an extern global swkwindow the same way? i didn't mean to hide the

Re: [dev] SWK: The simple widget kit

2010-05-13 Thread pancake
On 05/13/10 11:29, Anselm R Garbe wrote: On 13 May 2010 10:04, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: On 5/12/10, Rory Rory wrote: Right now it's not obvious what the widgets actually are. The textboxes look identical to the buttons and it's hard to know where to type into. don't care about

Re: [dev][surf]Your browser's cookie functionality is turned off. Please turn it on.

2010-05-13 Thread Cengiz Tas
I renamed my .surf directory but nothing changed although a new .surf directory was created. After changing the session time back to 3600 everything is fine. thx. On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Alex Puterbaugh wrote: > Occiasionally, the cookies file is corrupted somehow, and you'll get > this

Re: [dev][surf]Your browser's cookie functionality is turned off. Please turn it on.

2010-05-13 Thread Alex Puterbaugh
Occiasionally, the cookies file is corrupted somehow, and you'll get this error. Just delete your cookies file (default ~/.surf/cookies.txt) and that problem should go away. On 5/13/10, Cengiz Tas wrote: > hi mates.. > > whenever i try to log into my gmail account i get the above mentioned cooki

Re: [dev][surf]Your browser's cookie functionality is turned off. Please turn it on.

2010-05-13 Thread Jeremiah Dow
If change the sessiontime in your config.def.h back to 3600 or anything greater than 0, the cookie will set properly. I don't know if this is a bug with the session changes, or something specific to gmail. Jeremiah On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 5:38 AM, Cengiz Tas wrote: > hi mates.. > > whenever i

[dev][surf]Your browser's cookie functionality is turned off. Please turn it on.

2010-05-13 Thread Cengiz Tas
hi mates.. whenever i try to log into my gmail account i get the above mentioned cookie hint. but i didn deactivate anything. can anybody explain me what i am doing wrong? how can i use gmail with surf again? thx.. cengiz

Re: [dev] SWK: The simple widget kit

2010-05-13 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 13 May 2010 10:04, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > On 5/12/10, Rory Rory wrote: >> Right now it's not obvious what the widgets actually are. The >> textboxes look identical to the buttons and it's hard to know where to >> type into. > > don't care about the visual representation > that's the last thing

[dev] [OT] Preferred way of branching in hg

2010-05-13 Thread markus schnalke
Hoi, I have a project that is kept in a mercurial repo. Now I plan to branch a development version off. This means, I (1) want to go on fixing bugs in the stable version, and (2) want to start redesigning parts of the code base in a development branch. I want to branch as the development version m

Re: [dev] SWK: The simple widget kit

2010-05-13 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
On 5/12/10, Rory Rory wrote: > Right now it's not obvious what the widgets actually are. The > textboxes look identical to the buttons and it's hard to know where to > type into. don't care about the visual representation that's the last thing you wish to design the question is if the programmin