Re: [dev] Suckless BT client(s)?

2010-05-04 Thread zilog
Antoni Grzymala wrote: > zi...@freeshell.org dixit (2010-05-04, 02:04): > > > Was recently looking for a simple console BitTorrent client. Found ctorrent > > but it's unmaintained, and Enhanced CTorrent which is still being worked on. > > Found a few others like rtorrent but they seem to require

Re: [dev] Suckless BT client(s)?

2010-05-04 Thread Dmitry Maluka
Try btpd, a daemon + CLI.

Re: [dev] Suckless BT client(s)?

2010-05-04 Thread Martin Kopta
Ah, sorry, I missed your requierements.. On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 05:04:57PM +0200, Martin Kopta wrote: > Try bitflu. It is written in Perl, it is a daemon, it has telnet and web > interface, codebase is very small and it is very usable. >

Re: [dev] Suckless BT client(s)?

2010-05-04 Thread Martin Kopta
Try bitflu. It is written in Perl, it is a daemon, it has telnet and web interface, codebase is very small and it is very usable.

Re: [dev] Suckless BT client(s)?

2010-05-04 Thread Samuel Baldwin
This probably won't fit the bill exactly, but as a very heavy torrenter I've only found Deluge to offer all the features I need. Otherwise I just use rtorrent, although as we've seen it's still pretty heavy on the deps. -- Samuel Baldwin - logik.li

Re: [dev] Suckless BT client(s)?

2010-05-04 Thread Rory Rory
rtorrent supports DHT and encyption. Set encryption = allow_incoming,try_outgoing,enable_retry in your config file. rtorrent is usually considered better than transmission by most torrent sites. On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 2:36 PM, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > rtorrent's features are more t

Re: [dev] Suckless BT client(s)?

2010-05-04 Thread hiro
rtorrent's features are more than sufficient for most of us. It's not particularly "suckless", but it's ok for me. DHT is working, but I don't know about encryption and all that other fancy stuff... It can automatically add torrent files copied to some kind of listening-directory On 5/4/10, Dieter

Re: [dev] Suckless BT client(s)?

2010-05-04 Thread Antoni Grzymala
zi...@freeshell.org dixit (2010-05-04, 02:04): > Was recently looking for a simple console BitTorrent client. Found ctorrent > but it's unmaintained, and Enhanced CTorrent which is still being worked on. > Found a few others like rtorrent but they seem to require some additional > dependences lik

Re: [dev] Suckless BT client(s)?

2010-05-04 Thread Uriel
There is mjl's torrentfs: http://www.ueber.net/code/r/torrent and then there are a couple of bt clients people have started to write in Go (see http://go-lang.cat-v.org/go-code ) Unrelated but I do recommend mjl's excellent ircfs: http://www.ueber.net/code/r/ircfs uriel On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11

Re: [dev] Suckless BT client(s)?

2010-05-04 Thread Dieter Plaetinck
On Tue, 4 May 2010 16:09:22 +0600 mikhail maluyk wrote: > Take a look at transmission. > i think rtorrent is "ok". lightweight, but lacks some advanced features such as webseeds. Personally i prefer support for DHT, webseeds, encryption and whatnot. i just had a look at transmission, using it

Re: [dev] Suckless BT client(s)?

2010-05-04 Thread Gregor Best
I found transmission to be quite nice. It stores its configuration in JSON, has a console interface, can run as a daemon with a web interface and it has GTK/Qt guis (though those are quite sucky indeed). It also supports magnet links and PEX. -- GCS/IT/M d- s+:- a-- C++ UL+++ US UB++ P+++ L+++ E-

Re: [dev] Suckless BT client(s)?

2010-05-04 Thread mikhail maluyk
Take a look at transmission. -- Regards, Mikhail

Re: [dev] Suckless BT client(s)?

2010-05-04 Thread Leonardo Taccari
2010/5/4 : > Was recently looking for a simple console BitTorrent client.  Found ctorrent > but it's unmaintained, and Enhanced CTorrent which is still being worked on. > Found a few others like rtorrent but they seem to require some additional > dependences like Perl.  Maybe a good suckless proje

Re: [dev] Suckless BT client(s)?

2010-05-04 Thread Jimmy Tang
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 02:04:45AM -0700, zi...@freeshell.org wrote: > Was recently looking for a simple console BitTorrent client. Found ctorrent > but it's unmaintained, and Enhanced CTorrent which is still being worked on. > Found a few others like rtorrent but they seem to require some additio

Re: [dev] Suckless BT client(s)?

2010-05-04 Thread pancake
I use rtorrent, but i thouught it was pure :? - Original message - > Was recently looking for a simple console BitTorrent client.  Found ctorrent > but it's unmaintained, and Enhanced CTorrent which is still being worked on. > Found a few others like rtorrent but they seem to require some

[dev] Suckless BT client(s)?

2010-05-04 Thread zilog
Was recently looking for a simple console BitTorrent client. Found ctorrent but it's unmaintained, and Enhanced CTorrent which is still being worked on. Found a few others like rtorrent but they seem to require some additional dependences like Perl. Maybe a good suckless project? Jeff