Re: [dev] dwm does something bad to X.org 1.7.6

2010-04-08 Thread Enno Boland (Gottox)
2010/4/8 Thayer Williams : > On Apr 08, 2010 at 01:30 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote: >> Works fine here. >> >> god forbid they leave debug traces on development code, you ass > > wtf? god hope this isn't jeopardy and god hope "wtf" does not meant "what to fuck". -- http://gnuffy.chaotika.org - Real C

Re: [dev] [surf] downloads fix

2010-04-08 Thread Enno Boland (Gottox)
Very interesting though, downloading did work for me. (Doesn't make sense to me why it did) Anyway. It was added some time ago to stop loading a page when a download starts. But I thought I removed this piece of code. I'll fix that this evening. 2010/4/7 julien steinhauser : > On Wed, Apr 07, 2010

Re: [dev] [surf] downloads fix

2010-04-08 Thread pancake
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 11:06:43 +0200 julien steinhauser wrote: > On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:31:18AM +0200, Nibble wrote: > > reading the surf code I found the following two lines at > > loadstatuschange(): > > > > 423 if(c->download) > > 424 stop(c, NULL); > > > > Why are they there? >

Re: [dev] dwm does something bad to X.org 1.7.6

2010-04-08 Thread Thayer Williams
On Apr 08, 2010 at 01:30 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote: > Works fine here. > > god forbid they leave debug traces on development code, you ass wtf?

Re: [dev] dwm does something bad to X.org 1.7.6

2010-04-08 Thread Kurt H Maier
Works fine here. god forbid they leave debug traces on development code, you ass -- # Kurt H Maier

Re: [dev] dwm does something bad to X.org 1.7.6

2010-04-08 Thread julien steinhauser
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 09:26:47PM +0200, Benoit T wrote: > > Hello, > > Debian testing has replaced Xorg 1.7.5 with 1.7.6 about 3 days ago. > Because i had not logged out of my X session in between, i picked up the > new X server only today. > > dwm does something very wrong to it, causing it t

[dev] dwm does something bad to X.org 1.7.6

2010-04-08 Thread Benoit T
Hello, Debian testing has replaced Xorg 1.7.5 with 1.7.6 about 3 days ago. Because i had not logged out of my X session in between, i picked up the new X server only today. dwm does something very wrong to it, causing it to consume a lot of cpu (say 25-50% according to top with 3s interval) and m

Re: [dev][surf]

2010-04-08 Thread Jacob Todd
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 06:22:49PM +, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote: > ... > P.S. I'm new here. Why's XML so evil? If you don't have to test for > well-formed and validness, that is. http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/xml/ > -- > þx, > - Bjartur > -- I am a man who does not exist for others. p

Re: [dev] simple addictive wordgame

2010-04-08 Thread stanio
* pancake [2010-04-05 22:35]: > wg [dict] It's fun. Not a big deal, but just to let you know, here a word is required to be guessed twice: ->8-- [ l w p r _ _ ] [ j e _ _ _ _ ] 3: jew lew rep per pew rep 4: perl -8<

Re: [dev] [sw] Suckless web-framework

2010-04-08 Thread Paul Malherbe
On 08/04/10 11:45, Uriel wrote: Uhu? It would be impossible to write something like werc in Python , the unix command pipeline is one of the most powerful software concepts ever invented. I have made an attempt to code sw.cgi in python and have it working. Maybe not the best coding but it co

Re: [dev] [sw] Suckless web-framework

2010-04-08 Thread Florian Ermisch
Am 07.04.10 07:25, schrieb pancake: Is not the same... Backticks keeps newlines, but $() merges all lines into a single one. I'm not sure if this behaviour is affected by IFS Well, in ksh93 and bash 4.0 on OpenSolaris build 134, ksh and bash 3.0 on solaris 10 and ksh and bash 2.0 on solaris 9

Re: [dev] [sw] Suckless web-framework

2010-04-08 Thread Uriel
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Paul Malherbe wrote: > Again I totally agree with Uriel, rather use a good scripting language like > python ;-) Uhu? It would be impossible to write something like werc in Python , the unix command pipeline is one of the most powerful software concepts ever inven