I noticed that the server is barely reachable today, I guess there are
some network problems...
On 29 January 2010 16:52, Kris Maglione wrote:
> Original inexplicably bounced:
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Kris Maglione
> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:45:53 -0500
> Subject: Re:
Original inexplicably bounced:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Kris Maglione
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:45:53 -0500
Subject: Re: [dev] [dmenu] xft patch
To: dev mail list
On 2010-01-27, Nathan Neff wrote:
> Thanks to Kyle Murphy and dmenu authors for dmenu and the xft patch for
>
Original bounced:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Kris Maglione
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:44:29 -0500
Subject: Re: [dev] [dmenu] xft patch
To: dev mail list
On 2010-01-28, Thayer Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Nathan Neff wrote:
>> I had to find a way to burn
$ G_DEBUG=fatal-criticals gdb ./surf
(gdb) cont
...
(gdb) bt
Evgeny Grablyk wrote:
I tried this on Arch linux x64, surf-hg. It did not segfault, but
produced these warnings on each border click:
(:31278): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_window_get_events: assertion
`GDK_IS_WINDOW (window)' failed
(:31278
I tried this on Arch linux x64, surf-hg. It did not segfault, but
produced these warnings on each border click:
(:31278): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_window_get_events: assertion
`GDK_IS_WINDOW (window)' failed
(:31278): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion
`G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed
(:31
Anselm R Garbe wrote:
Well I've heared these reasons before and I don't buy them. There are
toolchains like the BSD ones and they proof pretty much that the
"everything is a Makefile approach" is the most portable and
sustainable one. Running a configure script from 10 years ago will
fail immedia
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 08:33:13 +, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 28 January 2010 20:46, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Couldn't you just rename surf to porn?
>
> Or rather pornium ;)
No, no, no,
Just suckless-porn 8-P~
Erno Kuvaja
> That's a corner case ;)
An edge case surely.
Jon.
On 28 January 2010 20:46, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Couldn't you just rename surf to porn?
Or rather pornium ;)
On 29 January 2010 08:00, Jonathan Slark wrote:
>
> I'm running surf under dwm. I accidently clicked it's border and *womph* it
> disapeared! I ran surf from a terminal so I could see any output and
> repeated the click, it did the same thing saying there was a segmentation
> fault.
>
> Other
can't reproduce on 32bit/64bit.
2010/1/29 pancake :
> That's a corner case ;)
>
> On Jan 29, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Jonathan Slark
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm running surf under dwm. I accidently clicked it's border and *womph*
>> it disapeared! I ran surf from a terminal so I could see any output and
>> r
That's a corner case ;)
On Jan 29, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Jonathan Slark
wrote:
I'm running surf under dwm. I accidently clicked it's border and
*womph* it disapeared! I ran surf from a terminal so I could see
any output and repeated the click, it did the same thing saying
there was a s
> Hi,
> If you are archlinux user check it
> 32bit:
> http://archrepo.spof.pl/i686/terminus-font-4.28-3-i686.pkg.tar.gz
> 64bit
> http://www.dziq.pl/uploads/terminus-font-4.28-3-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz
> It's patched version of terminus font. IMO looks very good.
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dev mail lis
I'm running surf under dwm. I accidently clicked it's border and *womph* it
disapeared! I ran surf from a terminal so I could see any output and repeated
the click, it did the same thing saying there was a segmentation fault.
Other windows in dwm don't seem to have the same problem; if I clic
14 matches
Mail list logo
