On 2010-01-14, Yuval Hager wrote:
> I am trying to send notifications using 'notify-send' (libnotify) and I
> found out they work only if they are sent from tag 1.
> otherwise, I get the following message from dbus-daemon:
>
> ,
> | (:5963): Wnck-WARNING **: Someone set a weird number of deskt
On 2009-12-31, Noah Tye wrote:
> I run trayer, a small system tray, so that I can run nm-applet and use
> Gnome's volume applet. Trayer is automatically started via my wmiirc,
> however, it is not visible on all views (it's not sticky).
>
> I want trayer to be sticky. This is possible[1] via:
>
On 2010-01-24, Andreas Wagner wrote:
> I am running linux in virtualbox and I have switched from stumpwm to wmii. I
> have a problem I did not have when using stumpwm, this leads me to believe
> the problem may be a wmii problem not a virtualbox problem. When I resize
> the Virtualbox display wind
Hello wmii devs,
I am running linux in virtualbox and I have switched from stumpwm to wmii. I
have a problem I did not have when using stumpwm, this leads me to believe
the problem may be a wmii problem not a virtualbox problem. When I resize
the Virtualbox display window under wmii the X display
Hi,
I'm wondering if anyone has had particularly good experiences with any
meta-build system (cmake, etc) in the following circumstances:
I will have a large codebase which consists of some generic files and
some processor specific files. (I'm not worried about OS environent
stuff like "has vsnpr
On Sun 24 Jan 2010 at 13:48:08 PST Charlie Kester wrote:
On Sun 24 Jan 2010 at 13:26:56 PST Premysl Hruby wrote:
On (24/01/10 13:07), Charlie Kester wrote:
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 13:07:14 -0800
From: Charlie Kester
To: dev@suckless.org
Subject: Re: [dev] [OFFTOPIC] How to know the size of a pr
> TAOUP also recommends small programs that do just one thing. If you
> have so many options that you need a "huge structure" to store them,
> that might be a sign that your program is overly complex. Consider
> factoring it into a set of smaller cooperating processes.
It is not too big, but the
Well said.
> TAOUP also recommends small programs that do just one thing. If you
> have so many options that you need a "huge structure" to store them,
> that might be a sign that your program is overly complex. Consider
> factoring it into a set of smaller cooperating processes.
>
> Many people
On Sun 24 Jan 2010 at 11:57:34 PST anonymous wrote:
Where programs should store their options? Sometimes it is said that
global variables are bad, but what is better? Some huge structure
storing all options? Of course, they can be divided into many
structures or they can be passed on a stack inst
On Sun 24 Jan 2010 at 13:26:56 PST Premysl Hruby wrote:
On (24/01/10 13:07), Charlie Kester wrote:
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 13:07:14 -0800
From: Charlie Kester
To: dev@suckless.org
Subject: Re: [dev] [OFFTOPIC] How to know the size of a process?
List-Id: dev mail list
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.20
User-
On (24/01/10 13:07), Charlie Kester wrote:
> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 13:07:14 -0800
> From: Charlie Kester
> To: dev@suckless.org
> Subject: Re: [dev] [OFFTOPIC] How to know the size of a process?
> List-Id: dev mail list
> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.20
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
>
> On Sun 2
On Sun 24 Jan 2010 at 09:42:59 PST Premysl Hruby wrote:
Btw, There's one issue with trying to get size of process -- shared
memory. To which process should it count? And how? Or count only
fraction for each of process using that shared memory ... Not easy. :-)
If the shared library really is s
Where programs should store their options? Sometimes it is said that
global variables are bad, but what is better? Some huge structure
storing all options? Of course, they can be divided into many
structures or they can be passed on a stack instead of passing pointer
to structure but it is not effe
> On (24/01/10 18:35), pmarin wrote:
> > Hi all.
> > Anyone know how to know the size (kb) of a process in Linux?
> > using the proc filesystem I can know the number of pages that it uses
> > (/proc/pid/statm). How I can convert
> > it to kb? Any posix way?
Here's some funny script [1] I'm aware o
pmarin dixit (2010-01-24, 18:35):
> Hi all.
> Anyone know how to know the size (kb) of a process in Linux?
> using the proc filesystem I can know the number of pages that it uses
> (/proc/pid/statm). How I can convert
> it to kb? Any posix way?
Man proc(5). The sizes given are in pages.
The rest
On (24/01/10 18:35), pmarin wrote:
> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:35:31 +0100
> From: pmarin
> To: dev@suckless.org
> Subject: [dev] [OFFTOPIC] How to know the size of a process?
> List-Id: dev mail list
>
> Hi all.
> Anyone know how to know the size (kb) of a process in Linux?
> using the proc fil
Hi all.
Anyone know how to know the size (kb) of a process in Linux?
using the proc filesystem I can know the number of pages that it uses
(/proc/pid/statm). How I can convert
it to kb? Any posix way?
pmarin
17 matches
Mail list logo
