Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe

2010-01-19 Thread Jacob Todd
Couldn't slock just ignore ctl,alt, &c? Basically any char that can't be used in a password. -- Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else. pgpap9fEkObwd.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [dev] Distribution

2010-01-19 Thread Josh Rickmar
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:50:29PM -0600, Kurt H Maier wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Samuel Baldwin > wrote: > > Extremely valid point. Are there any distros, gentoo or not, that > > don't use gcc in favour of something a little saner, though? Obviously > > Plan 9 doesn't count. > >

Re: [dev] [OT] Distribution

2010-01-19 Thread Kurt H Maier
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:56:56PM +0300, anonymous wrote: >> Why not Slackware? >> > > Why not suse? > > that's yasty -- # Kurt H Maier

Re: [dev] [OT] Distribution

2010-01-19 Thread hiro
good one, definitely worth this thread :D On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Samuel Baldwin wrote: > 2010/1/19 Antoni Grzymala : >> Why not feed trolls? > > Have you ever been near a troll when it's passed gas? Probably not, > otherwise you'd probably be in the hospital. > > -- > Samuel Baldwin -

Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe

2010-01-19 Thread hiro
BREAKING NEWS: MAC, WINDOWS, LINUX: NOT SAFE ANYMORE! The operating system market does not manage to recover from the crisis. After attacks from the Chinese government several errors in Microsoft Windows' Internet Explorer were identified. Anonymous sources claim having "total control over all Pcs

Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe

2010-01-19 Thread Nico Golde
Hi, * Nico Golde [2010-01-19 13:48]: > * Premysl Hruby [2010-01-19 12:21]: > > On (19/01/10 12:05), Nico Golde wrote: > > > * Andres Perera [2010-01-18 22:16]: > > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 4:23 PM, anonymous wrote: > > > > >> This thread is hilarious, I find it pretty funny that on a mailing

Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe

2010-01-19 Thread Nico Golde
Hi, * Nico Golde [2010-01-18 20:03]: > * Premysl Hruby [2010-01-17 16:53]: > > On (17/01/10 16:24), Gregor Best wrote: > > > Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 16:24:11 +0100 > > > From: Gregor Best > > > To: dev@suckless.org > > > Subject: Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe > > > List-Id: dev mail list > > > U

Re: [dev] [OT] Distribution

2010-01-19 Thread Samuel Baldwin
2010/1/19 Antoni Grzymala : > Why not feed trolls? Have you ever been near a troll when it's passed gas? Probably not, otherwise you'd probably be in the hospital. -- Samuel Baldwin - logik.li

Re: [dev] [OT] Distribution

2010-01-19 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Moritz Wilhelmy dixit (2010-01-19, 22:46): > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:56:56PM +0300, anonymous wrote: > > Why not Slackware? > > Why not suse? Why not feed trolls? -- [a]

Re: [dev] [OT] Distribution

2010-01-19 Thread Moritz Wilhelmy
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:56:56PM +0300, anonymous wrote: > Why not Slackware? > Why not suse?

Re: [dev] Distribution

2010-01-19 Thread anonymous
Why not Slackware?

Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe

2010-01-19 Thread markus schnalke
[2010-01-19 12:11] Premysl Hruby > > Problem here is not using exec startx or startx & exit, not using or not > using exec in xinitrc/xsession! I needed some time to get to the sense of the sentence, but now I reached it ... and yes, it's a nice play on words. Thanks, YMMD. meillo

Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe

2010-01-19 Thread Nico Golde
Hi, * Premysl Hruby [2010-01-19 12:21]: > On (19/01/10 12:05), Nico Golde wrote: > > * Andres Perera [2010-01-18 22:16]: > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 4:23 PM, anonymous wrote: > > > >> This thread is hilarious, I find it pretty funny that on a mailing > > > >> list of the > > > >> suckless pro

Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe

2010-01-19 Thread Dieter Plaetinck
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:11:24 +0100 Premysl Hruby wrote: > Problem here is not using exec startx or startx & exit, not using or > not using exec in xinitrc/xsession! > > -Ph say what?

Re: [dev] Distribution

2010-01-19 Thread Jacob Todd
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:34:47PM -0500, Samuel Baldwin wrote: > 2010/1/18 Jacob Todd : > > "I heard they made a sport out of gcc, it's called gentoo or something" > >        -Uriel > > > > I use Gentoo and Plan 9. > > Has anyone made gentoo work with anything besides gcc, like pcc or tcc? > > -

Re: [dev] Distribution

2010-01-19 Thread hiro
i use tiny core linux, it's definitely worth trying out!

Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe

2010-01-19 Thread Premysl Hruby
On (19/01/10 12:05), Nico Golde wrote: > Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:05:07 +0100 > From: Nico Golde > To: dev@suckless.org > Subject: Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe > List-Id: dev mail list > X-Mailer: netcat 1.10 > > Hi, > * Andres Perera [2010-01-18 22:16]: > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 4:23 PM, a

Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe

2010-01-19 Thread Nico Golde
Hi, * Andres Perera [2010-01-18 22:16]: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 4:23 PM, anonymous wrote: > >> This thread is hilarious, I find it pretty funny that on a mailing list of > >> the > >> suckless project people are suggesting all kinds of weird things to solve > >> this > >> instead just using e