On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Samuel Baldwin
wrote:
> Extremely valid point. Are there any distros, gentoo or not, that
> don't use gcc in favour of something a little saner, though? Obviously
> Plan 9 doesn't count.
I think the FreeBSD guys are working on a version built with clang. I
don't
2010/1/18 Kurt H Maier :
> people who don't use gcc have better sense than to use gentoo
Extremely valid point. Are there any distros, gentoo or not, that
don't use gcc in favour of something a little saner, though? Obviously
Plan 9 doesn't count.
--
Samuel Baldwin - logik.li
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Samuel Baldwin
wrote:
> Has anyone made gentoo work with anything besides gcc, like pcc or tcc?
people who don't use gcc have better sense than to use gentoo
--
# Kurt H Maier
2010/1/18 Jacob Todd :
> "I heard they made a sport out of gcc, it's called gentoo or something"
> -Uriel
>
> I use Gentoo and Plan 9.
Has anyone made gentoo work with anything besides gcc, like pcc or tcc?
--
Samuel Baldwin - logik.li
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:41:01PM +, Jonathan Slark wrote:
> I was wondering what distros people use on this mailing list? I've
> tried a lot and I'm not happy with any of them. All I need is a
> toolchain/dev utils with minimal X install. I would then compile all
> the apps/dwm myself a
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:07:50PM +0100, daspostloch wrote:
> On 01/18/2010 10:17 PM, Ryan R wrote:
> > Put this in your xorg.conf this turns off ctrl-alt-backspace and VT
> > switching.
> >
> > Section "ServerFlags"
> >Option "DontZap" "true"
> >Option "DontVTSwitch" "true"
> > EndSect
Jonathan Slark wrote:
I was wondering what distros people use on this mailing list? I've
tried a lot and I'm not happy with any of them. All I need is a
toolchain/dev utils with minimal X install. I would then compile all
the apps/dwm myself and install using the package manager.
you must
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Jonathan Slark
wrote:
> I was wondering what distros people use on this mailing list?
>
>
I'll go ahead and get the flame-war rolling...
[q9550 ~]:$ uname -a ; cat /etc/debian_version ; uptime
Linux q9550.0x95.net 2.6.26-2-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Nov 5 02:23:12 UTC 2009
Jonathan Slark dixit (2010-01-18, 22:41):
> I was wondering what distros people use on this mailing list? I've
> tried a lot and I'm not happy with any of them. All I need is a
> toolchain/dev utils with minimal X install. I would then compile all
> the apps/dwm myself and install using the
Might wanna check out stali. I personally use Arch Linux, OpenBSD, and
Plan 9, however.
--
Samuel Baldwin - logik.li
> All I need is a toolchain/dev utils with minimal X install.
Have you tried NetBSD? I prefer that over Linux, and the base
installation is exactly what you're describing.
On 18-01-2010 22:41:01, Jonathan Slark wrote:
> I was wondering what distros people use on this mailing list? I've
> tried a lot and I'm not happy with any of them. All I need is a
> toolchain/dev utils with minimal X install. I would then compile
> all the apps/dwm myself and install using the
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Jonathan Slark
wrote:
> PKGBUILDs use fakeroot for the whole build and the fakeroot docs say you
> should only use it for the make install.
>
> I have done an LFS/DIY build but then I had a look at the Xorg website:
> "The best place to get X is from your operating
I was wondering what distros people use on this mailing list? I've
tried a lot and I'm not happy with any of them. All I need is a
toolchain/dev utils with minimal X install. I would then compile all
the apps/dwm myself and install using the package manager.
Arch Linux comes pretty close bu
On 01/18/2010 10:17 PM, Ryan R wrote:
Put this in your xorg.conf this turns off ctrl-alt-backspace and VT switching.
Section "ServerFlags"
Option "DontZap" "true"
Option "DontVTSwitch" "true"
EndSection
Can we put an end to this thread nao? kthx
not everyone still has a xorg.conf
Put this in your xorg.conf this turns off ctrl-alt-backspace and VT switching.
Section "ServerFlags"
Option "DontZap" "true"
Option "DontVTSwitch" "true"
EndSection
Can we put an end to this thread nao? kthx
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 4:23 PM, anonymous wrote:
>> This thread is hilarious, I find it pretty funny that on a mailing list of
>> the
>> suckless project people are suggesting all kinds of weird things to solve
>> this
>> instead just using exec /usr/bin/dwm in ~/.xinitrc rather than /usr/bin/d
> This thread is hilarious, I find it pretty funny that on a mailing list of
> the
> suckless project people are suggesting all kinds of weird things to solve
> this
> instead just using exec /usr/bin/dwm in ~/.xinitrc rather than /usr/bin/dwm.
> Seriously, WTF?!
>
Just checked: I was always
This is actually not funny my lads...
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 07:51:09PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> * Julien Pecqueur [2010-01-17 16:22]:
> > I'm using slock and i am suprised to realize that is not safe at all!
> >
> > I launched slock in my DWM session. I just have to press CTRL+ALT+F1
> > and press CTRL+z (to send startx in
Hi,
* Premysl Hruby [2010-01-17 16:53]:
> On (17/01/10 16:24), Gregor Best wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 16:24:11 +0100
> > From: Gregor Best
> > To: dev@suckless.org
> > Subject: Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe
> > List-Id: dev mail list
> > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
> >
> > On Su
Hi,
* Julien Pecqueur [2010-01-17 16:22]:
> I'm using slock and i am suprised to realize that is not safe at all!
>
> I launched slock in my DWM session. I just have to press CTRL+ALT+F1
> and press CTRL+z (to send startx in background an get the hand on the
> shell) and type "killall slock" to
my setup:
external monitor (A) connected to a docking station. lets call the internal
display B. A is left of B.
first bug:
if i move a floating window with alt-shift-, from A to B it is positioned on
the left edge of B. if i try to move it back to A the window is assigned to A,
but its positi
2010/1/18 Swiat R. Gal :
>> this seems to be an issue in certain Xinerama implementations, I
>> identified the following a while ago:
>>
>> xrandr -s reproduces the issue you notice, whereas
>>
>> xrandr --output XY --mode wxh
>>
>> etc does work. Can you confirm?
>
> I confirm both. At the same ti
> this seems to be an issue in certain Xinerama implementations, I
> identified the following a while ago:
>
> xrandr -s reproduces the issue you notice, whereas
>
> xrandr --output XY --mode wxh
>
> etc does work. Can you confirm?
I confirm both. At the same time I do not know
how can one rest
I use the following script:
#! /bin/sh
output=LVDS
if [ -f /tmp/screen ]
then
output=`cat /tmp/screen`
fi
if [ $output = "VGA" ]
then
xrandr --output LVDS --auto
xrandr --output VGA --off
echo "LVDS" > /tmp/screen
else
xrandr --output VGA --auto
xrandr --output LVDS --off
ec
Great! Thanks for sharing
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:20:14AM +0100, pancake wrote:
> Sry for crossposting. I just find it interesting :)
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Tim Newsham
>> Date: January 15, 2010 8:54:38 PM GMT+01:00
>> To: 9f...@9fans.net
>> Subject: [9fans] more videos
>> R
Sry for crossposting. I just find it interesting :)
Begin forwarded message:
From: Tim Newsham
Date: January 15, 2010 8:54:38 PM GMT+01:00
To: 9f...@9fans.net
Subject: [9fans] more videos
Reply-To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9f...@9fans.net>
I put up some videos demonstrating A
Just thinking about the possibility to use the Diablo toolchain to
compile and optimize the binaries for stali instead of clang or a
plane gcc.
We could get really good optimizations.
Any volunteer for testing?
29 matches
Mail list logo
