Re: [dev] slock with non-system auth

2009-12-28 Thread anonymous
> If the program prints a expanation message and fails if it has read > permission, then I'd agree with you. > Maybe just add chmod inside makefile's install rule?

Re: [dev] slock with non-system auth

2009-12-28 Thread markus schnalke
[2009-12-28 22:18] Jessta > 2009/12/20 markus schnalke : > > [2009-12-19 21:37] pancake > >> > >> I have done two patches for slock. > >> > >> The first simplifying the use of cpp and the other adding user > >> defined password. > > > > The password should probably not be a clear text string ins

Re: [dev] slock with non-system auth

2009-12-28 Thread Jessta
2009/12/20 markus schnalke : > [2009-12-19 21:37] pancake >> >> I have done two patches for slock. >> >> The first simplifying the use of cpp and the other adding user >> defined password. > > The password should probably not be a clear text string inside the > binary file, as one can easily read