On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 12:29:48PM +0100, markus schnalke wrote:
> [2009-12-20 12:03] Moritz Wilhelmy
> > On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 11:53:02AM +0100, markus schnalke wrote:
> > >
> > > Maybe we could give slock a system account to check the password
> > > against. Thus it must not to be the own ac
Hi.
2009-12-20 12:50, Antoni Grzymala :
> Moritz Wilhelmy dixit (2009-12-20, 12:03):
> > On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 11:53:02AM +0100, markus schnalke wrote:
> > > [2009-12-19 21:37] pancake
> > >
> > > The password should probably not be a clear text string inside the
> > > binary file, as one can
Moritz Wilhelmy dixit (2009-12-20, 12:03):
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 11:53:02AM +0100, markus schnalke wrote:
> > [2009-12-19 21:37] pancake
> > >
> > > I have done two patches for slock.
> > >
> > > The first simplifying the use of cpp and the other adding user
> > > defined password.
> >
>
[2009-12-20 12:03] Moritz Wilhelmy
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 11:53:02AM +0100, markus schnalke wrote:
> >
> > Maybe we could give slock a system account to check the password
> > against. Thus it must not to be the own account, but can be a special
> > slock system user, which exists just for th
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 11:53:02AM +0100, markus schnalke wrote:
> [2009-12-19 21:37] pancake
> >
> > I have done two patches for slock.
> >
> > The first simplifying the use of cpp and the other adding user
> > defined password.
>
> The password should probably not be a clear text string insi
[2009-12-19 21:37] pancake
>
> I have done two patches for slock.
>
> The first simplifying the use of cpp and the other adding user
> defined password.
The password should probably not be a clear text string inside the
binary file, as one can easily read it with `strings slock'.
Is there a s
