One idea is to not install any CAS software on your own computers
(probably slow and crappy compared to some huge mainframe) and just
use WolframAlpha's. Check www.wolframalpha.com
In a suckless CAS consisting of multiple applications the apps are
combined easily by definition.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Preben Randhol wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:39:04 +
> Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>
>> Why not? I think it should be possible to have very minimalist and
>> specia
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:39:04 +
Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Why not? I think it should be possible to have very minimalist and
> specialized CAS', they managed to do that in the 50s and 60s, why not
> today?
We are not living in the 50's nor 60's... If the suckless approach is to
not include a fe
On (23/11/09 20:47), sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:47:48 +0100
> From: sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de
> To: dev mail list
> Subject: [dev] [OT] Bcc disaster: Bcc headers not stripped
> List-Id: dev mail list
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
>
> Hi guys,
>
> just sharin
> I'll take a look. Thanks.
I found my old .xbindkeysrc:
"wmiir xwrite /tag/sel/ctl select left"
mod4 + b:1
"wmiir xwrite /tag/sel/ctl select right"
mod4 + b:3
"wmiir xwrite /tag/sel/ctl select up"
mod4 + b:4
"wmiir xwrite /tag/sel/ctl select down"
mod4 + b:5
"wmiir xwrite /tag/sel/ctl s
sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de dixit (2009-11-23, 20:47):
> just sharing a frustrating experience I had on gmail couple of days ago.
> It might be helpful for somebody:
>
> Default, the tool chain mutt + ssmtp + gmail does *not* remove the Bcc
> headers! As long as you don't say
No, it's ssmtp's job to
