On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:14:12 +0100
Christoph Dibak wrote:
> I had to learn Ada at university. First I thought that this Pascal
> Syntax simply sucks. But then I realized that Ada is realy nice.
>
> The best part of Ada is that it is strongly-typed. I think also it is
> a good compromise between
2009/11/11 Antoni Grzymala :
> Looks like you didn't give more than half a minute's time, to see what
> Lisp's syntax (or rather the lack of it) is actually about. Your hopes
> are vain.
It doesn't take long to judge clarity. Perhaps experience is a
critical factor but to me it seems a lot easier
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 07:46:02PM +0100, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 06:00:53PM +0100, Preben Randhol wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:15:06 -0500
> > Kris Maglione wrote:
> >
> > > Looks more like Limbo/NewSqueak. And the mascot's kind of
> > > Glenda-ish (plus you mentio
[2009-11-11 18:53] Aled Gest
> 2009/11/11 markus schnalke :
> > Then you never tried Lisp!
>
> I hope that's sarcasm, because I wouldn't call requiring everything to
> be wrapped in parentheses clean :P
It wasn't.
I assume now even more, you never came much in contact with Lisp.
Laughing on th
Moritz Wilhelmy dixit (2009-11-11, 19:46):
> > On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:15:06 -0500
> > Kris Maglione wrote:
> >
> > > Looks more like Limbo/NewSqueak. And the mascot's kind of
> > > Glenda-ish (plus you mentioned Rob), so I wouldn't doubt it.
> > > If Rob was involved, I very much doubt that Ad
Aled Gest dixit (2009-11-11, 18:53):
> > Then you never tried Lisp!
>
> I hope that's sarcasm, because I wouldn't call requiring everything to
> be wrapped in parentheses clean :P
Looks like you didn't give more than half a minute's time, to see what
Lisp's syntax (or rather the lack of it) is a
apologies for the html
--
Jack J. Woehr# «'I know what "it" means well enough, when I find
http://www.well.com/~jax # a thing,' said the Duck: 'it's generally a frog or
http://www.softwoehr.com # a worm.'» - Lewis Carroll, _Alice in Wonderland_
Julien Steinhauser wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 06:53:48PM +, Aled Gest wrote:
2009/11/11 markus schnalke :
Then you never tried Lisp!
I hope that's sarcasm, because I wouldn't call requiring everything to
be wrapped in parentheses clean :P
I guess this thread could
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 06:53:48PM +, Aled Gest wrote:
>
> 2009/11/11 markus schnalke :
> > Then you never tried Lisp!
>
> I hope that's sarcasm, because I wouldn't call requiring everything to
> be wrapped in parentheses clean :P
>
I guess this thread could easily turn into a big hairy trol
2009/11/11 markus schnalke :
> Then you never tried Lisp!
I hope that's sarcasm, because I wouldn't call requiring everything to
be wrapped in parentheses clean :P
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 06:00:53PM +0100, Preben Randhol wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:15:06 -0500
> Kris Maglione wrote:
>
> > Looks more like Limbo/NewSqueak. And the mascot's kind of
> > Glenda-ish (plus you mentioned Rob), so I wouldn't doubt it.
> > If Rob was involved, I very much doubt
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 05:59:19PM +0100, Preben Randhol wrote:
> Syntactically the language seems a bit confusing at first and
> unfortunately too similar to C.
It looks a like a messy mix of C and pascal. Would be better
without the pascal part.
[2009-11-11 17:40] Aled Gest
> 2009/11/11 Preben Randhol :
> > Syntactically the language seems a bit confusing at first and
> > unfortunately too similar to C.
>
> I don't get what people have against the C syntax. It's the cleanest
> and most logical syntax I've come across so far.
Then you n
2009/11/11 Preben Randhol :
> Syntactically the language seems a bit confusing at first and
> unfortunately too similar to C.
I don't get what people have against the C syntax. It's the cleanest
and most logical syntax I've come across so far.
Has anybody had any experience compiling Go on BSD ye
I miss the Brian Kernighan's tutorial...
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> 2009/11/11 Julien Steinhauser :
>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:06:55AM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm officially announcing a go excercise project called: godwm (dwm
>>> implemented in Go)
>
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:15:06 -0500
Kris Maglione wrote:
> Looks more like Limbo/NewSqueak. And the mascot's kind of
> Glenda-ish (plus you mentioned Rob), so I wouldn't doubt it.
> If Rob was involved, I very much doubt that Ada was an
> intentional influence. Actally, it seems very much more
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:04:07 +
Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Well there is gccgo for performance worried people.
At the moment the gccgo is slower than the 6g compiler, but according
to Rob the compiled code is better with gccgo
At the moment speed is 10-20% slower than pure C, but you get all t
I succeded in compiling a *.deb package using 'make deb' modifing a
line in mk/wmii.mk, for LIBS9, I used the absolute path to the various
lib/lib*.a
The package compiles and I got a *deb package, even if some warnings
and an error remain.
>From the output:
dh: Unknown sequence .depend (choose fr
2009/11/11 Julien Steinhauser :
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:06:55AM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>>
>> I'm officially announcing a go excercise project called: godwm (dwm
>> implemented in Go)
>>
>
> I see a second way of reading the name, I'm sure I'm not alone.
It must be by accident ;)
Kind r
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:06:55AM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>
> I'm officially announcing a go excercise project called: godwm (dwm
> implemented in Go)
>
I see a second way of reading the name, I'm sure I'm not alone.
> Kind regards,
> Anselm
>
>
Hello,
> I'm officially announcing a go excercise project called: godwm (dwm
> implemented in Go)
i'd be interested in helping with this
Regards,
Mate
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:46:27PM +0100, pancake wrote:
About the compiler stuff..i dont really know if they can generate good code,
I mean, related to code optimizations they are assembling it all together in
a very good way, but I dont see any post optimization process which will
involve autom
2009/11/11 pancake :
> rob pike, russ cox and ken thomson are in the list of CONTRIBUTORS.
Yes, that makes me not ignore that lang.
> I will also like to know if there's any interface for C and how to use it.
It seems to be possible, though it's not officially supported yet wrt Russ:
Have a loo
rob pike, russ cox and ken thomson are in the list of CONTRIBUTORS.
I see 'go' as the limbo for the masses. Google did the things well (again).
They get the best people able to design a language and a compiler and put
it together in a single mashup.
The compiler is pretty similar to the plan9 o
[2009-11-11 11:06] Anselm R Garbe
>
> I'm officially announcing a go excercise project called: godwm (dwm
> implemented in Go)
Great name! :-)
meillo
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:22:42AM +0100, Preben Randhol wrote:
I noticed that Google has released and opened sourced the Go language
(http://golang.org). I watched the tech talk by Rob Pike and it seems
interesting, although it didn't answer all questions. Go seems to be based
on C, Python, Ada,
2009/11/11 Preben Randhol :
> I noticed that Google has released and opened sourced the Go language
> (http://golang.org). I watched the tech talk by Rob Pike and it seems
> interesting, although it didn't answer all questions. Go seems to be based
> on C, Python, Ada, Pascal/Modula/Oberon language
I noticed that Google has released and opened sourced the Go language
(http://golang.org). I watched the tech talk by Rob Pike and it seems
interesting, although it didn't answer all questions. Go seems to be based
on C, Python, Ada, Pascal/Modula/Oberon languages.
Though it would be interesting a
28 matches
Mail list logo
