On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> 2009/10/21 Uriel :
>> Surf should *not* handle downloads or display source, this are clearly
>> and obviously best handled by external tools and there is zero reason
>> for them to be part of any browser.
>
> I disagree with downloads, becau
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 04:12:08PM +0200, hiro wrote:
> Should do a 9p file server with some kind of cookie and session cache,
> also precache.
using 9p for surf sounds great. This way it should be simple to share data
between multiple surf windows
Regards
On 23-10-2009 19:26:50, Julien Pecqueur wrote:
> Le mardi 20 octobre 2009 à 02:44:53, Tadeusz Sośnierz a écrit :
> > Hello,
> > I wrote some patch for bookmark handling, attached. Everything is driven
> > by the right-click menu. Sadly, I had no idea how to include some labels
> > for the urls. Als
Le mardi 20 octobre 2009 à 02:44:53, Tadeusz Sośnierz a écrit :
> Hello,
> I wrote some patch for bookmark handling, attached. Everything is driven
> by the right-click menu. Sadly, I had no idea how to include some labels
> for the urls. Also, I'm rather beggining with C, so I'm sorry for any
> ey
Should do a 9p file server with some kind of cookie and session cache,
also precache.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Claudio M. Alessi wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:09:25AM -0700, Charlie Kester wrote:
>> It seems to me that the problems being discussed in this subthread arise
>> because
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:07:03PM +0200, Uriel wrote:
> This whole thread is stupid: the complaint about UTF-8 chars is
> stupid, and the "copyright notice" is stupid.
>
> A simple mention in the readme like: "This code is released to the
> public domain and under the MIT and ISC licenses, pick w
i dont have this segfault in my archlinux 32 bits.
Moritz Wilhelmy wrote:
Hi,
I updated my arch-system one minute ago and surf seems to segfault with
the newest webkit (1.1.15.3).
I recompiled the newest surf from hg, and the same happens.
GDB said:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentati
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:09:25AM -0700, Charlie Kester wrote:
> It seems to me that the problems being discussed in this subthread arise
> because the "browser" combines two very distinct concerns:
>
> - managing the http traffic to and from the website, which includes the
> administrative det
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:15:31AM +0200, Thomas Dahms wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 22:18:07 -0400
Kris Maglione wrote:
wmii 3.9 Beta 1 has just been released.
Cool. I don't care about releases, but really appreciate that you fixed
almost (let me remind you that issue 22 still cries "Fix me!")
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 22:18:07 -0400
Kris Maglione wrote:
> wmii 3.9 Beta 1 has just been released.
Cool. I don't care about releases, but really appreciate that you fixed
almost (let me remind you that issue 22 still cries "Fix me!") all
major bugs recently.
--
Thomas Dahms
Yeah that seems to do the trick. As long as I stick to one monitor and
don't expect detached windows to remember their positions, it's not
too bad.
Cheers,
Alex
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> 2009/10/23 Alex Matviychuk :
>> Sorry I should of been more clear. I can under
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:25:43PM -0400, Kris Maglione wrote:
> Hell, even MS's console font has ©, and has since the early DOS days.
Sure, that was even one of the first char they put in their fonts.
12 matches
Mail list logo
