On 2009-10-20, Suraj Kurapati wrote:
> I haven't been able to access it since yesterday.
>
> Visiting http://hg.suckless.org/wmii/atom-log shows:
Yep, just noticed that, too. ssh works fine, so I hadn't noticed, but
http's gone.
You can use the Google mirror for now. It's kept up-to-date.
http:
I haven't been able to access it since yesterday.
Visiting http://hg.suckless.org/wmii/atom-log shows:
The page you are looking for is temporarily unavailable.
Please try again later.
Just stand on the right side please.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Martin Swift wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 05:38:00PM +0200, Uriel wrote:
>> Then somebody needs to be burned at the stake. In this day and age,
>> anyone using *any* encoding other than UTF-8 need to be lockedup and
>> hav
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 05:38:00PM +0200, Uriel wrote:
> Then somebody needs to be burned at the stake. In this day and age,
> anyone using *any* encoding other than UTF-8 need to be lockedup and
> have the key thrown into a black hole, enough harm has been done
> already by retarded encodings.
I
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 04:18:32PM -0400, Kris Maglione wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 04:04:12PM -0400, Josh Rickmar wrote:
> >I would like to (re)write an irc bot using sic, but the formatted output
> >is making this harder then it could/should be. For example, the first
> >field, the channel o
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 04:04:12PM -0400, Josh Rickmar wrote:
I would like to (re)write an irc bot using sic, but the formatted output
is making this harder then it could/should be. For example, the first
field, the channel or irc server, is cut off at 12 characters by a
colon. This becomes a pro
I would like to (re)write an irc bot using sic, but the formatted output
is making this harder then it could/should be. For example, the first
field, the channel or irc server, is cut off at 12 characters by a
colon. This becomes a problem when trying to parse the output because
longer field names
The patch has been updated in the mercurial repo of the page, let's hope the
mod uploads it fast.
Yahoo! Cocina
Encontra las mejores recetas con Yahoo! Cocina.
http://ar.mujer.yahoo.com/cocina/
Very neat. Is it Ok if I post this to http://ninetimes.cat-v.org/tips/ ?
Thanks!
uriel
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Kris Maglione wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 05:39:30PM +0200, Uriel wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Kris Maglione
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> But, I notice you don't
Hello everyone,
there is a problem with pertag and dwm 5.7.2. I used pertag-5.7.2 from
dwm.suckless.org.
Patching works fine, no errors there. But if i change the size of master
area and change from tag 2 back to back 1 the size is the default one.
The layouts (floating, tile, monocle) work for ea
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> Are you proposing that nationals of a single non-English nationality
> (which was the topic of the main thread among other things) should
> communicate between themselves in English because there's the God-send
> called ASCII and Uriel says
Uriel dixit (2009-10-19, 16:24):
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> > On 10/18/09, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> >>> ASCII works just fine, thanks.
> >>
> >> Just fine for the Americans?
> >
> > fine for anyone who is willing to communicate in english
>
> People unwilling to c
How can you spend that much time talking about shit?
I wonder how many people can make the world better with all your spare
time (R).
Uriel wrote:
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 10/18/09, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
ASCII works just fine, thanks.
Jus
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> On 10/18/09, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
>>> ASCII works just fine, thanks.
>>
>> Just fine for the Americans?
>
> fine for anyone who is willing to communicate in english
People unwilling to communicating in English are not worth communicating
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Tor Aqissiaq
wrote:
> The only reason XHTML did not replace HTML is because IE did not and
> does not support it. It is no more geekier than HTML.
Wrong, even on Firefox, Opera, and WebKit XHTML is badly broken and is
*slower* to parse than HTML. (Plus it breaks a
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Tor Aqissiaq
wrote:
> What is wrong with XHTML? Are you implying that HTML is superior?
Yes, HTML is superior to XHTML, I was wrong about this one for years,
but now it is completely clear to me that XML is *always* the wrong
answer, and XHTML is what proved it, e
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> 2009/10/18 Tor Aqissiaq :
>> XHTML, parsed using an XML parser is very specifically defined and
>> does not look different in different browsers, but few people serve
>> XHTML documents with the application/xhtml+xml headers, because IE
>> r
XHTML is failure, and has been pretty much abandoned even by the web
2.0 people. Believe it or not, XHTML is still seriously crippled when
compared to HTML, and even the XHTML validator can't use it!
Also turns out most browsers render XHTML much more slowly than HTML,
because parsing XHTML is *HA
Hi,
I agree with both the toggleflash and the history (of yesterday) patches going
around and they (or
something like them) have my vote for inclusion in vanilla. Two comments.
(1) The history should be toggle-able or, at the very least, define-able. I'll
slap out a patch
when I have time.
(2
Hello,
Here is a searchengine patch for surf 0.2 (changed pasteuri() to
geturi() as pasteuri() was alredy taken), and new toggleflash, saving
another 1 LOC. Hope that will help someone.
Constructive critisism welcome.
Regards,
Ted
--
===
(
20 matches
Mail list logo
