Hi,
I wrote a little patch for surf which allows you to define custom search
engines, so you can google for "foo bar" simply by loading the url "g
foo bar" (or any other search engine you prefer).
Put this in your config.h:
> static SearchEngine searchengines[] = {
> { "g", "http://www.goo
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:53:35AM +0200, Mark Edgar wrote:
* Fix buffer overrun when using strncpy()
It's really sad to see code using strncpy.
* Use startswith() macro instead strncmp()
Macros don't go over so well around here, but I'm in favor of
that one (even if as a utility function
All,
My apologies if this has been addressed on the list, but I just
upgraded from dwm 5.5 to dwm 5.6.1, and the following features using
the default config.h don't seem to be working:
- The title of the focused window is not showing up in the status bar
(getting a 0)
- The selected tags are ind
Here's a summary of the changes in this patch:
* Fix buffer overrun when using strncpy()
* Use startswith() macro instead strncmp()
* Use strcmp() instead of strncmp() where appropriate
* Use const char * where appropriate
* Use size_t instead of unsigned int in readl().
The startswith() macro is
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Uriel wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Antoni Grzymala
> wrote:
>> I reckon it's been the best toolkit ever. And I quite like the
>> programming language it's been thought out to work with. Ever tried
>> writing a Tk app?
>
> People that bash Tk have ne
Don Suck Harder, the Eris Discordia of suckless...
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> Kurt H Maier dixit (2009-09-22, 16:54):
>
>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Uriel wrote:
>> > I hope that means he is porting it to Tk.
>>
>> god knows I'm not in love with gtk, but Tk is a pretty big pile of
>> crap in its own right
>
2009/9/22 Don Harper :
> if it bugs you so much, why not set a filter, and keep your childish
> attitude to yourself?
Why should I waste my time setting up such a thing because some people
are too stupid or lazy to learn how to send email?
> You can never change the world, but you can
> change
Kurt H Maier dixit (2009-09-22, 16:54):
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Uriel wrote:
> > I hope that means he is porting it to Tk.
>
> god knows I'm not in love with gtk, but Tk is a pretty big pile of
> crap in its own right
I reckon it's been the best toolkit ever. And I quite like the
pr
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Uriel wrote:
> I hope that means he is porting it to Tk.
god knows I'm not in love with gtk, but Tk is a pretty big pile of
crap in its own right
--
# Kurt H Maier
Christian G. Warden dixit (2009-09-22, 11:48):
> > Seems simpler, and does the job. BTW, I'm using the following viewer for
> > the html-only e-mails (via .mailcap):
> >
> > text/html; /usr/bin/elinks -dump -force-html '%s'; copiousoutput;
> > description=HTML Text; nametemplate=%s.html
> >
> >
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 08:11:34PM +0200, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> Don Harper dixit (2009-09-22, 12:56):
>
> > In mutt, it is as easy as:
> > # Plain as default:
> > message-hook ~A 'alternative_order text/plain'
>
> I use just that:
>
> alternative_order text/plain text/enriched text/html
>
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 08:05:22PM +0200, Anders Andersson wrote:
> Whut? Lightweight resources on the host? How do you figure running a
> text editor in obfuscated javascript in a browser locally on your
> computer is lighter than running a text editor natively?
AND selling all your company and p
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 04:40:13PM +0200, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
Hi,
in wmii, let's say I go to a new tag, open a window, make sure it's not
floating but rather the default layout.
then i fullscreen this window.
then i launch a new window (using dmenu or whatever)
result: new window opens, but
Uriel wrote:
Can we setup a filter for dev@suckless.org that sends any html email
to /dev/null, and autoreplies with "Fuck off moron." to the author of
any such email?
Thanks
uriel
I know it's against your principles, but couldn't you just send your
mail through a filter? You might have th
Don Harper dixit (2009-09-22, 12:56):
> In mutt, it is as easy as:
> # Plain as default:
> message-hook ~A 'alternative_order text/plain'
I use just that:
alternative_order text/plain text/enriched text/html
Seems simpler, and does the job. BTW, I'm using the following viewer for
the html-o
Whut? Lightweight resources on the host? How do you figure running a
text editor in obfuscated javascript in a browser locally on your
computer is lighter than running a text editor natively?
// pipe
2009/9/22 Don Harper :
> Are you opposed to using the cloud? Google docs fits the bill, ie,
>
if it bugs you so much, why not set a filter, and keep your childish
attitude to yourself? You can never change the world, but you can
change what you see in the world.
Oh, wait...I just noticed your MUA is gmailhtml from the git-go...
Seriously, Fix you own email experience, and STFU with t
Uriel dixit (2009-09-22, 19:26):
> > If you want RTF your options are Ted and Abiword. I use Ted --
> > specifically the gtk port recently released; until then I used to
> > motif version. Ted's author is active working on it, and has told me
> > the next release will focus on cleaning up aftere
Are you opposed to using the cloud? Google docs fits the bill, ie,
lightweight resources on the host, and you can do some disconnected
work, I think...
don
2009/9/22 Илья Илембитов :
> Hi,all!
>
>
>
> I am looking for a lightweight solution to create rich formatted content in
> any MS Word-edit
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> If you want RTF your options are Ted and Abiword. I use Ted --
> specifically the gtk port recently released; until then I used to
> motif version. Ted's author is active working on it, and has told me
> the next release will focus on cleani
If you want RTF your options are Ted and Abiword. I use Ted --
specifically the gtk port recently released; until then I used to
motif version. Ted's author is active working on it, and has told me
the next release will focus on cleaning up aftereffects of the gtk
port.
--
# Kurt H Maier
2009/9/22 Илья Илембитов :
>> RTF sucks.
> Why? And what is a better MS Word-editable format? (since that is what
> required by editors in the magazine where I work and in my university) ODT
> isn't really mature yet and didn't get any proper support in MS Word. DOC is
> closed. .WPF then? (sinc
test
22.09.09, 19:20, "Anselm R Garbe" :
> To create a less sucking word processor, one need to start with a less
> sucking doc format.
> For legacy stuff I'd rather rip off the OO importer bits (afaik Google
> uses them in Google Docs as well).
> Kind regards,
> Anselm
Well, a new format could be a ni
Hi, all!
I am looking for a lightweight solution to create rich formatted content in any
MS Word-editable format - I think RTF is more likely to happen, since it is an
open format.
Basically, what I am looking for is a lightweight, distractionless (preferably
no menus or toolbars) word process
Oops, sorry. I reposted the topic in plain text, could anyone possibly remove
this one?
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 06:39:05PM +0400, Илья Илембитов wrote:
> > ...
> Don't send html email to the list.
>
--
wbr, Илембитов
> RTF sucks.
Why? And what is a better MS Word-editable format? (since that is what required
by editors in the magazine where I work and in my university) ODT isn't really
mature yet and didn't get any proper support in MS Word. DOC is closed. .WPF
then? (since it is actually supported by nearly
2009/9/22 Uriel :
> Can we setup a filter for dev@suckless.org that sends any html email
> to /dev/null, and autoreplies with "Fuck off moron." to the author of
> any such email?
Well I'm fine with a more polite filter that does just that.
Kind regards,
Anselm
Can we setup a filter for dev@suckless.org that sends any html email
to /dev/null, and autoreplies with "Fuck off moron." to the author of
any such email?
Thanks
uriel
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Hi Илья,
>
> 2009/9/22 Илья Илембитов :
>> I am looking for a lightwei
Hi Илья,
2009/9/22 Илья Илембитов :
> I am looking for a lightweight solution to create rich formatted content in
> any MS Word-editable format - I think RTF is more likely to happen, since it
> is an open format.
I'm looking for such thing as well. On IRC in the #suckless channel
someone posted
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 06:39:05PM +0400, Илья Илембитов wrote:
>...
Don't send html email to the list.
--
Jake Todd
// If it isn't broke, tweak it!
pgp04h1Oy5YFS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,all! I am looking for a lightweight solution to create rich formatted content in any MS Word-editable format - I think RTF is more likely to happen, since it is an open format. Basically, what I am looking for is a lightweight, distractionless (preferably no menus or toolbars) word processor wit
33 matches
Mail list logo
