On Fri 18 Sep 2009 at 18:33:48 PDT Pinocchio wrote:
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:41:16 -0700, Uriel wrote:
Please, lets kill this before it even gets started, we had a huge
discussion about this crap in 9fans if anyone is interested.
Can you summarize why do you think it is crap, for those who are
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Pinocchio wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:41:16 -0700, Uriel wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Did you take a look at the "blocks" extension to the C language in
>>> Apple's
>>> recently opensourced GCD? They fought with some of the same problems you
>>> mention above but they wor
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:22:44 -0700, frederic wrote:
The OO debate in this thread is also very interesting. I would argue
that its really a trade-off between "predicting" future changes in your
source and "getting the prediction wrong". I would argue that it is
_great_ to see a lot of code reuse
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:46:35 -0700, Uriel wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:22 PM, frederic wrote:
Anticipating changes in the code is a generally a bad idea, because your
predictions are likely to fail
This can't be repeated often enough. Your predictions are not likely
to fail, they are *b
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:41:16 -0700, Uriel wrote:
Did you take a look at the "blocks" extension to the C language in Apple's
recently opensourced GCD? They fought with some of the same problems you
mention above but they worked around it.
Please, lets kill this before it even gets started, we
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:22 PM, frederic wrote:
> Anticipating changes in the code is a generally a bad idea, because your
> predictions are likely to fail
This can't be repeated often enough. Your predictions are not likely
to fail, they are *bound to crumble in an epic implosion of pure
fail*.
2009/9/18 hiro <23h...@googlemail.com>:
> Not sure if this is relevant, but I've found the best way to stay calm
> while browsing the interwebs is using whitelists.
> A good UI implementation would include a flash and java script button
> which would add the site and load the scripts...
>
> Is Nosc
Why not using dmenu for that? Just an idea though...
On Sep 18, 2009 8:34 PM, "Rory Rory" wrote:
Here is the actual patch. Sorry, I sent the wrong file the first time.
On 9/18/09, Rory Rory wrote: > Sorry, the patch I
sent is broken. If you ...
--
Rory
Here is the actual patch. Sorry, I sent the wrong file the first time.
On 9/18/09, Rory Rory wrote:
> Sorry, the patch I sent is broken. If you replace strcat(...) on line
> 426 with g_strconcat(workdir,"/urls.txt",NULL) it will work.
>
> On 9/18/09, Rory McCann wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> I've added
Sorry, the patch I sent is broken. If you replace strcat(...) on line
426 with g_strconcat(workdir,"/urls.txt",NULL) it will work.
On 9/18/09, Rory McCann wrote:
> Hello
>
> I've added a very simple url completion mode to surf, using a
> GtkEntryCompletion object. It only completes urls from a fi
Hello
I've added a very simple url completion mode to surf, using a
GtkEntryCompletion object. It only completes urls from a file just now,
although I'm hoping to add history completion as well. It reads from
~/.surf/urls.txt and each address should be on a new line. Bear in mind that it
isn't
>> I don't see how that hits any reasonably modern computer resources (I
>> mean Opera, firefox is notorious for bringing down to its knees anything
>> you throw at it). Resource usage is not an argument in this discussion
>> for me. Actually, I'd use dwm were it written in Tcl/Tk or Python, for I
You could use jdownloader for rapidshit. The UI is shit but you can
also talk to it via telnet I think. I'm sorry for recommending java
software, but I've seen no better implementation for this task.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Slawomir Gonet wrote:
> Hello.
> I'm trying to use start using s
Not sure if this is relevant, but I've found the best way to stay calm
while browsing the interwebs is using whitelists.
A good UI implementation would include a flash and java script button
which would add the site and load the scripts...
Is Noscript working this way?
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 2:4
On 9/18/09, Claudio M. Alessi wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:27:41PM +0200, pancake wrote:
>> Flash sucks
> Yeah. It may be the problem. If not, no matter: flash sucks anyway :-)
>
>
> Regards,
> Claudio M. Alessi
>
> --
> JID: smoppy AT gmail.com
> WWW: http://cma.teroristi.org
>
>
I was ex
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 05:00:05 +0200, Pinocchio wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 04:58:39 -0700, Szabolcs Nagy
wrote:
On 9/16/09, Frederic DUBOIS wrote:
2009/9/16 Uriel :
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:03 AM, frederic
wrote:
I'm pretty sure that if C featured closures, Anselm would cleverly
use
Type checking is only needed if your language needs ot have types, one
of the most amazing discoveries for me while using rc (
http://rc.cat-v.org ) to build werc ( http://werc.cat-v.org ) is how
well things can work with just one datatype (in the case of rc, the
list of strings).
Type cheking is
thanks a lot :)
2009/9/18 pancake :
> http://surf.suckless.org/files/
--
http://gnuffy.chaotika.org - Real Community Distro
http://surf.suckless.org/files/
Enno Boland (Gottox) wrote:
Feel free to add them to the cms :)
2009/9/18 pancake :
We should put these scripts and CSS's available in the website (like in dwm
patches)
Enno Boland (Gottox) wrote:
for now there's a user-javascript which can be used to
Feel free to add them to the cms :)
2009/9/18 pancake :
> We should put these scripts and CSS's available in the website (like in dwm
> patches)
>
> Enno Boland (Gottox) wrote:
>>
>> for now there's a user-javascript which can be used to hide most
>> flashbanners/javaapplets. Later there will be a
We should put these scripts and CSS's available in the website (like in
dwm patches)
Enno Boland (Gottox) wrote:
for now there's a user-javascript which can be used to hide most
flashbanners/javaapplets. Later there will be also something like
noscript/adblock.
Here's an example to hide flash/
for now there's a user-javascript which can be used to hide most
flashbanners/javaapplets. Later there will be also something like
noscript/adblock.
Here's an example to hide flash/java. put it into ~/.surf/script.js:
var elementNames = new Array("object","applet");
for(var i = 0; i < elementNam
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:27:41PM +0200, pancake wrote:
> Flash sucks
Yeah. It may be the problem. If not, no matter: flash sucks anyway :-)
Regards,
Claudio M. Alessi
--
JID: smoppy AT gmail.com
WWW: http://cma.teroristi.org
> Also, I would like to know, what do people on this list feel about type
> checking in general?
a fan, definitely. if i gave a damn about customizing my WM i'd use xmonad. but
stock dwm is fine..
24 matches
Mail list logo
