Changed Throughout to Any, made some cleanups for argv parsing and
applied it. Thanks :)
2009/9/16 Anselm R Garbe :
> Hi there,
>
> see attached a diff that cleans up the surf code a little bit:
>
> - it introduces camel case for the enum values (to avoid confusion with
> macros)
> - it renames e
If surf is going to ever be useful for anything it must include *by
default* something like NoScript.
uriel
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Anders Andersson wrote:
> You could stop using websites that obfuscates and breaks the web by
> covering up everything in javascript. This may not be a sol
Hi there,
see attached a diff that cleans up the surf code a little bit:
- it introduces camel case for the enum values (to avoid confusion with macros)
- it renames enum value ALWAYS into Throughout (that avoids some mask
conflict with some other "Always" from GTK or something else)
- it removes
2009/9/16 pancake :
> As I understand, the tabbing functionality will be implemented with XID as
> multiple embedded
> surfs inside an external application managing the tabs. It is far more
> secure and simple. (like in chromium)
>
Well, thanks for your anwsers. Maybe I'll give a chance to dwm/ta
* poz [2009-09-16 15:56]:
> 2009/9/16 Anselm R Garbe :
>
> > I think tab support in firefox/IE/chrome/Safari/Opera is just a ugly
> > workaround due to the limitations present in floating desktop
> > environments. Tab support is the WMs job -> use dwm and it'll work
> > like a charm to use tags a
As I understand, the tabbing functionality will be implemented with XID
as multiple embedded
surfs inside an external application managing the tabs. It is far more
secure and simple. (like in chromium)
Guillaume Leconte wrote:
Hi surf-list!
I wonder if there is a schedule for the next develop
You could stop using websites that obfuscates and breaks the web by
covering up everything in javascript. This may not be a solution to
your problem though.
// pipe
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Slawomir Gonet wrote:
> Julien Pecqueur dixit (2009-09-14, 20:26):
>
>> Right click / download li
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:55:22 +0200
poz wrote:
> 2009/9/16 Anselm R Garbe :
>
> > I think tab support in firefox/IE/chrome/Safari/Opera is just a ugly
> > workaround due to the limitations present in floating desktop
> > environments. Tab support is the WMs job -> use dwm and it'll work
> > like
2009/9/16 poz :
> 2009/9/16 Anselm R Garbe :
>
>> I think tab support in firefox/IE/chrome/Safari/Opera is just a ugly
>> workaround due to the limitations present in floating desktop
>> environments. Tab support is the WMs job -> use dwm and it'll work
>> like a charm to use tags and layouts in co
Hi!
2009/9/16 Slawomir Gonet :
> I think that there is no plans for tabs support.
>
Yes and no. surf supports X embedding. This can be used to embed surf
into another Xwindow. Actually I'm writing on another application,
named tabbed[1]. When it's in a usable state, it will be able to
display diff
2009/9/16 Anselm R Garbe :
> I think tab support in firefox/IE/chrome/Safari/Opera is just a ugly
> workaround due to the limitations present in floating desktop
> environments. Tab support is the WMs job -> use dwm and it'll work
> like a charm to use tags and layouts in conjunction with surf.
M
That doesn't sound very suckless. The window manager is there to
manage multiple instances of surf, why should the browser need its own
window managment? Wouldn't it be better to adjust the window manager
to work well with multiple windows instead of adding tabs to each and
every application? I wou
2009/9/16 Guillaume Leconte :
> Hi surf-list!
>
> I wonder if there is a schedule for the next developpment on surf. Is
> it planned to add multi-tab support? If no, I guess I'll take a look
> at the code and submit an ugly-but-functional patch.
I think tab support in firefox/IE/chrome/Safari/Oper
I think that there is no plans for tabs support.
pgpUGyfR5FVRU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi surf-list!
I wonder if there is a schedule for the next developpment on surf. Is
it planned to add multi-tab support? If no, I guess I'll take a look
at the code and submit an ugly-but-functional patch.
--
« I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire
off the shoulder
Julien Pecqueur dixit (2009-09-14, 20:26):
> Right click / download linked file...
>
> :)
Uhm, there's problem. When i click with right mouse button on rapidshare
"download button", nothing happens. On other links (such as links to pages)
works good.
What to do?
Greetings.
pgpyylIXGijsQ.pgp
A whole thread about masturbating to ones favorite programming paradigm
2009/9/16 Mate Nagy :
>> i'd argue that closures don't mix well with the c style of programming
>>
>> eg if you add closures then you'd need anonymous functions then you'd
>> start writing in the functional style passing a
> i'd argue that closures don't mix well with the c style of programming
>
> eg if you add closures then you'd need anonymous functions then you'd
> start writing in the functional style passing around functions then
> you'd need memory management to clean up the return values and
> arguments (so
On 9/16/09, Frederic DUBOIS wrote:
> 2009/9/16 Uriel :
>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:03 AM, frederic wrote:
>>> I'm pretty sure that if C featured closures, Anselm would cleverly use
>>> them
>>> and
>>> make an even more simple, customizable and elegant dwm.
>>
>> I'm pretty sure that if C featu
2009/9/16 Uriel :
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:03 AM, frederic wrote:
>> I'm pretty sure that if C featured closures, Anselm would cleverly use them
>> and
>> make an even more simple, customizable and elegant dwm.
>
> I'm pretty sure that if C featured closures, Anselm and many others
> would pro
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> 2009/9/16 Alan Busby :
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Anselm R Garbe
> >>
> >> IDE's like Eclipse have code assitance support to generate these
> >> automatically, great isn't it? So if you imagine a Java program where
> >> each d
2009/9/16 Alan Busby :
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Anselm R Garbe
>>
>> IDE's like Eclipse have code assitance support to generate these
>> automatically, great isn't it? So if you imagine a Java program where
>> each datum access happens through getters and setters, the program
>> must be
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Anselm R Garbe
>
> IDE's like Eclipse have code assitance support to generate these
> automatically, great isn't it? So if you imagine a Java program where
> each datum access happens through getters and setters, the program
> must become a magnitude faster if the
2009/9/15 frederic :
> I believe that closures could improve dwm for instance. Anselm says that
> he doesn't miss them, but it seems to me that he used a lot of tricks to
> replace
> them.
> For instance, the Monitor struct packs all of the fields that a layout
> function may need.
> The Arg union
24 matches
Mail list logo
