Re: [dev] 9base-3

On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Uriel wrote: > I don't have a lifetime to spend studying all the debian arcana and > follow their byzantine bureaucracy. I guess you'll just have to learn bash then -- # Kurt H Maier

Re: [dev] 9base-3

I don't have a lifetime to spend studying all the debian arcana and follow their byzantine bureaucracy. uriel On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:57 PM, Preben Randhol wrote: > On Fri, 7 Aug 2009 22:00:48 +0200 > Uriel wrote: > >> To me, the only difference is that unlike p9p, 9base does get packaged >>

Re: [dev] 9base-3

On Fri, 7 Aug 2009 22:00:48 +0200 Uriel wrote: > To me, the only difference is that unlike p9p, 9base does get packaged > into Debian. Aside from that I see little benefit. It is rather sad > that nobody packages p9p for Debian, but seems to be a lost battle http://www.debian.org/devel/join/

Re: Re : [dev] dmenu : auto confirm when only one item remains

On Aug 13, 2009, at 10:05 AM, Julien Steinhauser wrote: Julien Steinhauser a écrit : IMO very bad idea. If you do that you won't be able to run command with arguments (eg. urxvt -e irssi). Regards, Slawek. You're right, but dmenu is small enough to have several version in / usr/local/bi

Re: Re : [dev] dmenu : auto confirm when only one item remains

Julien Steinhauser a écrit : IMO very bad idea. If you do that you won't be able to run command with arguments (eg. urxvt -e irssi). Regards, Slawek. You're right, but dmenu is small enough to have several version in /usr/local/bin. At the moment, I've one with Fresch patch for vertical di

Re: [dev] dmenu : auto confirm when only one item remains

markus schnalke dixit (2009-08-13, 16:35): > [2009-08-13 16:27] Antoni Grzymala > > Lorenzo Bolla dixit (2009-08-13, 11:07): > > > > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Anselm R Garbe > > > wrote: > > > > > > > What about > > > > > > > > echo 'rm -rf /' | dmenu? > > > > > > I bet someone's g

Re: [dev] dmenu : auto confirm when only one item remains

markus schnalke wrote: [2009-08-13 16:27] Antoni Grzymala Lorenzo Bolla dixit (2009-08-13, 11:07): On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: What about echo 'rm -rf /' | dmenu? I bet someone's gonna try it... It's not gonna do anything by its

Re: [dev] dmenu : auto confirm when only one item remains

Lorenzo Bolla wrote: On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Anselm R Garbe > wrote: What about echo 'rm -rf /' | dmenu? � I bet someone's gonna try it... Permission Denied

Re: [dev] dmenu : auto confirm when only one item remains

[2009-08-13 16:27] Antoni Grzymala > Lorenzo Bolla dixit (2009-08-13, 11:07): > > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > > > > > What about > > > > > > echo 'rm -rf /' | dmenu? > > > > I bet someone's gonna try it... > > It's not gonna do anything by itself. Not now ...

Re: [dev] dmenu : auto confirm when only one item remains

Lorenzo Bolla dixit (2009-08-13, 11:07): > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > > > What about > > > > echo 'rm -rf /' | dmenu? > > I bet someone's gonna try it... It's not gonna do anything by itself. -- [a]

Re: [dev] dmenu : auto confirm when only one item remains

On (12/08/09 20:39), Julien Steinhauser wrote: > Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:39:41 +0200 > From: Julien Steinhauser > To: dev@suckless.org > Subject: [dev] dmenu : auto confirm when only one item remains > User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090701) > List-Id: dev mail list > > Hello,

Re: [dev] dmenu : auto confirm when only one item remains

My wifi script reads the last-used wep key for a connection from a file and gives it to dmenu, which uses it as the "default" value unless the user types something different. With this patch the user wouldn't be able to change the wep key. Seems like it's time for a patch db like dwm has. -- #

Re: [dev] [PATCH] dwm -- Proper SIGCHLD usage , fix issue with uncollected processes

Anselm R Garbe writes: > > I'm fine with this patch, will be applied soon. We think you should also consider changing line 1431 to call sigchld(0) instead of signal(SIGCHLD, sigchld). I haven't tested this yet, though. Neale >> --- >>  dwm.c |    8 +--- >>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+

Re: [dev] dmenu : auto confirm when only one item remains

[2009-08-13 09:32] markus schnalke > > Do you know about McIlroy's tale about `cat'? Of course you don't know it, because it's a tale about `echo'. ;-) http://everything2.com/title/The+UNIX+and+the+Echo meillo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [dev] dmenu : auto confirm when only one item remains

On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > What about > > echo 'rm -rf /' | dmenu? I bet someone's gonna try it...

Re: [dev] [PATCH] dwm -- Proper SIGCHLD usage , fix issue with uncollected processes

2009/8/11 Premysl 'Anydot' Hruby : > This is much cleaner and portable way of using SIGCHLD. It also disallow > existence of defunct processes, one which are executed for example from > .Xsession before (on the end) exec /path/../dwm > --- >  dwm.c |    8 +--- >  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+

Re: [dev] dmenu : auto confirm when only one item remains

What about echo 'rm -rf /' | dmenu? ;) 2009/8/12 Julien Steinhauser : > On Aug 12, 2009, at 21:56 PM, Donald Chai wrote: > >>You're so close! >> >>Adding the following lines to the end of the match(void) procedure should >> do the trick: >>        if(item && item==itemend) { >>            fprint

Re: [dev] [PATCH] dwm -- Proper SIGCHLD usage , fix issue with uncollected processes

On (12/08/09 22:14), Neale Pickett wrote: > Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:14:47 -0600 > From: Neale Pickett > To: dev mail list > Subject: Re: [dev] [PATCH] dwm -- Proper SIGCHLD usage , fix issue with > uncollected processes > List-Id: dev mail list > > Premysl 'Anydot' Hruby writes: > > > This

Re: [dev] dmenu : auto confirm when only one item remains

[2009-08-12 23:32] Sławomir Gonet > > IMO very bad idea. If you do that you won't be able to run command > with arguments (eg. urxvt -e irssi). Yes, one might want to use dmenu simply as command launcher, no matter what's piped into it. If the list changes dynamically, then it is not possible an