http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/99yom/the_secret_of_success_suck_less/
Enjoy.
uriel
Premysl 'Anydot' Hruby writes:
> This is much cleaner and portable way of using SIGCHLD. It also
> disallow existence of defunct processes, one which are executed for
> example from .Xsession before (on the end) exec /path/../dwm
I contributed the original sigchld patch. I like your patch, Anyd
IMO very bad idea. If you do that you won't be able to run command with
arguments (eg. urxvt -e irssi).
Regards,
Slawek.
You're right, but dmenu is small enough to have several version in
/usr/local/bin.
At the moment, I've one with Fresch patch for vertical display and xmms like
matching,
f
IMO very bad idea. If you do that you won't be able to run command with
arguments (eg. urxvt -e irssi).
Regards,
Slawek.
-Original Message-
From: Julien Steinhauser
Sent: 12 sierpnia 2009 20:39
To: dev@suckless.org
Subject: [dev] dmenu : auto confirm when only one item remains
Hello,
S
On Aug 12, 2009, at 21:56 PM, Donald Chai wrote:
>You're so close!
>
>Adding the following lines to the end of the match(void) procedure
should do the trick:
>if(item && item==itemend) {
>fprintf(stdout, "%s", item->text);
>fflush(stdout);
>running =
Premysl Hruby --> dev (2009-08-12 17:39:26 +0200):
> On (12/08/09 17:24), Jukka Salmi wrote:
[...]
> > Seems fine, but -- assuming POSIX.1 reliable signals -- you don't need
> > to reestablish the handler before returning from it. Or should systems
> > with the old semantics really be supported by
On Aug 12, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Julien Steinhauser wrote:
Hello,
Sorry, I don't write to bring a patch.
I wander if someone has already patched dwm
to make it auto confirm when, (as said in the subject)
only one item remains.
I've found something on the mailing list which is almost
what I wish b
Dnia 2009-08-12, o godz. 14:45:47
Colin Shea napisał(a):
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 08:39:41PM +0200, Julien Steinhauser wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Sorry, I don't write to bring a patch.
> > I wander if someone has already patched dwm
> > to make it auto confirm when, (as said in the subject)
> > only
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 08:39:41PM +0200, Julien Steinhauser wrote:
> Hello,
> Sorry, I don't write to bring a patch.
> I wander if someone has already patched dwm
> to make it auto confirm when, (as said in the subject)
> only one item remains.
>
> I've found something on the mailing list which is
Hello,
Sorry, I don't write to bring a patch.
I wander if someone has already patched dwm
to make it auto confirm when, (as said in the subject)
only one item remains.
I've found something on the mailing list which is almost
what I wish but not exactly, it auto confirms on exact match.
It could
On (12/08/09 17:24), Jukka Salmi wrote:
> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:24:24 +0200
> From: Jukka Salmi
> To: dev@suckless.org
> Subject: Re: [dev] [PATCH] dwm -- Proper SIGCHLD usage , fix issue with
> uncollected processes
> List-Id: dev mail list
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-20)
>
> Premys
Premysl 'Anydot' Hruby --> dev (2009-08-11 23:43:58 +0200):
> This is much cleaner and portable way of using SIGCHLD. It also disallow
> existence of defunct processes, one which are executed for example from
> .Xsession before (on the end) exec /path/../dwm
> ---
> dwm.c |8 +---
> 1 file
On 10.08.2009, at 21:22, Yoshi Rokuko wrote:
a few days ago i tried out last[1]. i found out that it uses factotum
and i managed to give factotum my lastfm-id but the sourcecode and/or
the lastfm API is to complex for me to know how to use last[1].
i know inside last[1] there is the help comma
Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_window_set_title: assertion `title != NULL' failed
to reproduce:
1. open surf
2.
surf-title.patch
Description: Binary data
14 matches
Mail list logo
