On 2009-07-14, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Have fun and enjoy the new dwm!
Will do, thanks :).
--
Sincerely,
Antony Jepson / / GPG Key: 0xFA10ED80
pgpA3O9RhIuuF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
* Uriel [2009-07-14 02:04]:
>
> [...] The software industry has become an endless wheel of regurgitated
> reinvented square wheels, plus huge efforts to 'optimize' said square
> wheels buy adding even more square wheels to the assembly.
>
Well, adding them properly *and* infinitely often you *w
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 08:46:25PM +0100, Jimmy Tang wrote:
>
> I'd agree with you on the point that it is a human invention/discovery
> of how we perceive the world. There are just somethings in the area which
> people have real issues with the philosophical impact of the decisions
> made with th
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 09:33:32PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
> > > Which god is that then? Odin? Zeus? God? ...
> > >
> >
> > since its quantum mechanics, how about all of them at the same time :)
>
> Heheh, my point was more that quantum mechanics is a human invention to
> try to describe re
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:22:49 +0100
Jimmy Tang wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 06:46:57PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
> > > quantum computing is indeed a god-made absurdity :P
> >
> > Which god is that then? Odin? Zeus? God? ...
> >
>
> since its quantum mechanics, how about all of them at th
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 06:46:57PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
> > quantum computing is indeed a god-made absurdity :P
>
> Which god is that then? Odin? Zeus? God? ...
>
since its quantum mechanics, how about all of them at the same time :)
>
> I guess one says nano-technology was an absurdit
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:39:19 +0200
Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> these are misjudgments of possibilities
Exactly :-)
> i believe that quantum mechanics will be as absurd in 2020 as it was
> in 1920
2020 yes, but later maybe...
On 7/14/09, Preben Randhol wrote:
>> absurdity stems from the unintuitive laws of quantum mechanics, not
>> from the novelty of the technology, it won't change over time.
>
> perhaps not intuitively, but I also remember an IBM boss claiming 5
> computers would be sufficient for the world back in t
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:16:22 +0200
Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> absurdity stems from the unintuitive laws of quantum mechanics, not
> from the novelty of the technology, it won't change over time.
perhaps not intuitively, but I also remember an IBM boss claiming 5
computers would be sufficient for the
2009/7/14 Tadeusz Sośnierz :
> Dnia 2009-07-14, o godz. 18:24:06
> Anselm R Garbe napisał(a):
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I'm glad to announce the new dwm-5.6 release which can be fetched from
>>
>> http://code.suckless.org/dl/dwm/dwm-5.6.tar.gz
>>
>> This release contains the new Xinerama support that
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:16:22 +0200
Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> i'm not sure about your second comment. did you mean that cs is not a
> proper science by the falsifiability definition (popper)? or that it
> has less organized knowledge/less important than the others?
No, it is young science. Comparin
Dnia 2009-07-14, o godz. 18:24:06
Anselm R Garbe napisał(a):
> Hi there,
>
> I'm glad to announce the new dwm-5.6 release which can be fetched from
>
> http://code.suckless.org/dl/dwm/dwm-5.6.tar.gz
>
> This release contains the new Xinerama support that creates a view per
> Xinerama screen.
Hi there,
I'm glad to announce the new dwm-5.6 release which can be fetched from
http://code.suckless.org/dl/dwm/dwm-5.6.tar.gz
This release contains the new Xinerama support that creates a view per
Xinerama screen. Focusing different screens works using the mouse or
the new shortcuts Mod1-. a
On 7/14/09, Preben Randhol wrote:
> I guess one says nano-technology was an absurdity if you go some
> decades back... CS is still a banal science compared to
> chemistry/physics/mathematics etc...
absurdity stems from the unintuitive laws of quantum mechanics, not
from the novelty of the technol
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Preben Randhol wrote:
> Which god is that then? Odin? Zeus? God? ...
Óðinn, definitely.
--
Samuel 'Shardz' Baldwin - staticfree.info/~samuel
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:07:51 +0100
Jimmy Tang wrote:
> quantum computing is indeed a god-made absurdity :P
Which god is that then? Odin? Zeus? God? ...
I guess one says nano-technology was an absurdity if you go some
decades back... CS is still a banal science compared to
chemistry/physics/ma
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 08:25:15AM -0600, Jack Woehr wrote:
> I'm in my late 50's. It occurs to me as a possibility that barely
> practical QC will be
> the last great computational hardware leap forward during my working
> years. I'm
> guessing (I've lived through a lot of changes!) that by th
Jimmy Tang wrote:
I haven't looked into quantum computing in a while myself, the last time
I looked at it the prototypes were all still toys, and it was mostly
theory. I probably won't see a fully functioning quantum computer in my
life time and I'm still young :)
I'm in my late 50's. It occu
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 06:15:18PM -0600, Jack Woehr wrote:
>
> So I have decided to flee from the man-made absurdity of software
> engineering
> into the god-made absurdity of quantum computing :)
>
I haven't looked into quantum computing in a while myself, the last time
I looked at it the prot
19 matches
Mail list logo
