[dev] [dwm] llvm+clang

2009-07-06 Thread Jacob Todd
Just wanted to let those of you who cared that dwm 5.5 compiles with llvm and clang from svn. Just change `CC = cc` to `CC = clang`. -- Jake Todd // If it isn't broke, tweak it! pgpPq1xTHonO3.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [dev] dwm in a window

2009-07-06 Thread Uriel
Funny, I would think X apologists need to find something new to whine about. As for Plan 9 not being the future, it seems that even the X developers themselves disagree with you, there is a reason they lifted the new X rendering model directly from plan9's draw device. uriel On Mon, Jul 6, 2009

Re: [dev] dwm in a window

2009-07-06 Thread hiro
We could also just start moaning in canon. For I at least like to moan about bashing about moaning about bash. Thank you for your attention.

Re: [dev] dwm in a window

2009-07-06 Thread Preben Randhol
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 01:30:13 +0200 Uriel wrote: > How is it different from rio[1]? > > Oh, wait, forgot that X is over thirty years behind on window system > technology[2]. I'm getting fed up with this X bashing. Can't you put effort in making something better than moaning about X all the time.

Re: [dev] dwm: per-mon lt[] fix patch

2009-07-06 Thread Anselm R Garbe
2009/7/6 Mate Nagy : > Greetings, >  the attached patch moves the lt[] array inside the Monitor structure, > so setting layout on one monitor doesn't alter it on another in any way. Makes sense, will be applied soon. --Anselm

[dev] dwm: per-mon lt[] fix patch

2009-07-06 Thread Mate Nagy
Greetings, the attached patch moves the lt[] array inside the Monitor structure, so setting layout on one monitor doesn't alter it on another in any way. Regards, Mate diff -r 4fff5050c835 dwm.c --- a/dwm.c Thu Jul 02 20:56:23 2009 +0100 +++ b/dwm.c Mon Jul 06 11:44:00 2009 +0200 @@ -136,6 +136,