Because acme/sam/wily/whatever is so fucking awesome.
Plan 9 != autoawesome.
On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 03:10:20AM +0200, Uriel wrote: > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at
10:09 PM, Claudio M. Alessi wrote:
>
> Vim is a textbook example of how *never* *ever* design a program's
> user interface.
>
> uriel
And that's where uzbl, surf, and vimpression come in.
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 10:39:41PM +0200, hiro wrote:
> Web browsers suck more and more.
>
--
Jake Todd
// If it isn't broke, tweak it!
pgpUNQUXf2xOF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Claudio M. Alessi wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 05:59:01PM +0200, Uriel wrote:
>> You guess wrong.
> Since your problem is a correct behave of ^W an such "unix" shortcuts I think
> I guessed right.
That is *one* of my problems, nowhere I said that that was my on
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Leandro
Chescotta wrote:
> [...]
> La información del presente documento es clasificada como Confidencial.
WTF?
You are judging it by the gtk linux port, which is clearly useless and
braindead (IIRC they even use glade *yuck*). The whole point is that
it doesn't really depend on any toolkit, there is even a framebuffer
port, so it should be trivial (compared to webkit) to build a sane
interface for it.
As f
I think the web sucks more and more... i think all internet sites need to have
a flash and a text-browser-friendly versión, if they insist of using flash.
Maybe a search engine like wulfram alpha, where you don't browse looking for a
specific site, but information instead, and it formats that in
Web browsers suck more and more.
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 05:59:01PM +0200, Uriel wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Claudio M. Alessi wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 09:51:59AM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> >> this is the biggest reason I hate firefox too. ^u should not view
> >> source, it should erase the damn line.
> >
2009/7/3, Alex Matviychuk :
> Very cool, thanks! Any way to zoom in or increase text size? That's
> the only thing I need to make this replace firefox a lot of the time
> for me.
ctrl+[+] ctrl+[-]
> Cheers,
>
> Alex
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 8:29 PM, totoloco wrote:
>
> > There is a PKGBUILD
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 05:59:01PM +0200, Uriel wrote:
> You guess wrong.
Since your problem is a correct behave of ^W an such "unix" shortcuts I think
I guessed right.
> This is a bug and a sign of how much FireFox sucks.
You are likely right; though it's obvious that you can still *fully* custom
On 7/3/09, Uriel wrote:
> to go, at the moment I really like Net-Surf
> http://www.netsurf-browser.org/ it is the only browser around written
> in a sane language that doesn't depend on any braindead toolkit and
> has the potential to be usable.
answering from netsurf..
* feels a bit faster than
On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:51:52 -0400
Robert C Corsaro wrote:
> fluxbox used to have a "tab" feature where the window title would be
> split into tabs so you'd have one frame for many windows. Perhaps
> wmii could have a similar feature as a mode. like stacked, max,
> normal and +tabbed.
If I re
Connor Smith wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 16:27:45 +0900
Alex Matviychuk wrote:
Good point. Do you think a tabbed interface is inappropriate as well
or is that something that would be considered a valid component?
Also, does anyone know of a good stand alone adblock? Privoxy doesn't
pick up m
yy wrote:
2009/7/3 Alex Matviychuk :
Also, does anyone know of a good stand alone adblock? Privoxy doesn't
pick up most of the ads adblock targets.
Actually, a good private proxy with greasemonkey support would be
really useful for me. I found GrimeApe, but it is written in Java
(eek
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Claudio M. Alessi wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 09:51:59AM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote:
>> this is the biggest reason I hate firefox too. ^u should not view
>> source, it should erase the damn line.
> I guess you (and Uriel) would be happy with the VIMperator extes
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 09:51:59AM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> this is the biggest reason I hate firefox too. ^u should not view
> source, it should erase the damn line.
I guess you (and Uriel) would be happy with the VIMperator extesion. Take in
mind that FireFox is *fully* customizable; it shou
> If it was a "plugin" of sorts (ie, optional), I think it would very
> neat. Having not looked at the source for surf, I don't know how that
> would work... I somewhat doubt surf has an extensions API. ;) In the
> worst case, a factotum patch could at least be written.
API? God, I hope not, that
I wrote a chrome extension that fixes this ;)
http://repo.cat-v.org/burning_chrome/hosaka/
I might write a similar extension for Firefox some day..
uriel
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Uriel wrote:
>> This reminds me that it would be very c
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 09:51:59 -0500
Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Uriel wrote:
> > This reminds me that it would be very cool if surf could use
> > factotum/secstore (
> > http://doc.cat-v.org/plan_9/4th_edition/papers/auth ) from p9p to
> > store and manage passwords.
>
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Uriel wrote:
> This reminds me that it would be very cool if surf could use
> factotum/secstore (
> http://doc.cat-v.org/plan_9/4th_edition/papers/auth ) from p9p to
> store and manage passwords.
it would be cooler if we didn't have *yet another* useful thing
crufte
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Connor Smith wrote:
> The impression I get from Surf is that it, like uzbl, adheres to
> the Unix philosophy by "doing one thing" - it renders web pages. One of
> the problems that arises from having your bookmarks, passwords, etc all
> managed by a single monolithi
thanks, no problem with:
#> eix webkit -Ic
[I] net-libs/webkit-gtk (1.1...@07/03/2009): Open source web browser en
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> 2009/7/2 Luca Postregna :
> > In my gentoo-box, with:
> >
> > #> eix webkit -Ic
> > [I] net-libs/webkit-gtk (0_p40220...@07
I could see this very useful in web design. I would like to embed this
in an Emacs buffer or window and then render a page on my local
server. I could then make some simple Emacs-like shortcut wrappers so
that I could refresh surf without switching windows. I could even
implement some of the bookma
En 02/07/2009 21:58:01, Samuel Baldwin escribió:
I'm wondering how people use this; I normally have upwards of 30 tabs
open in firefox at a given time. I understand the idea is to let the
window manager manage the instances, but for someone like me, this
doesn't work too well.
I suppose I coul
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 16:27:45 +0900
Alex Matviychuk wrote:
> Good point. Do you think a tabbed interface is inappropriate as well
> or is that something that would be considered a valid component?
>
> Also, does anyone know of a good stand alone adblock? Privoxy doesn't
> pick up most of the ads a
On Fri Jul 03, 2009 at 09:53:57AM +0200, yy wrote:
> 2009/7/3 Alex Matviychuk :
> > Also, does anyone know of a good stand alone adblock? Privoxy doesn't
> > pick up most of the ads adblock targets.
> >
>
> Actually, a good private proxy with greasemonkey support would be
> really useful for me.
> Also, does anyone know of a good stand alone adblock? Privoxy doesn't
> pick up most of the ads adblock targets.
disabling JS and using an /etc/hosts file like http://someonewhocares.org/hosts/
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> > On 7/3/09, Samuel Baldwin wrote:
> >>
2009/7/3 Alex Matviychuk :
> Also, does anyone know of a good stand alone adblock? Privoxy doesn't
> pick up most of the ads adblock targets.
>
Actually, a good private proxy with greasemonkey support would be
really useful for me. I found GrimeApe, but it is written in Java
(eek!).
--
- yiyus
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 09:48:21 +0900, Alex Matviychuk wrote:
> Very cool, thanks! Any way to zoom in or increase text size? That's
> the only thing I need to make this replace firefox a lot of the time
> for me.
Ctrl-plus (shift+equals) and Ctrl-minus. Reset it with Ctrl+0.
Good point. Do you think a tabbed interface is inappropriate as well
or is that something that would be considered a valid component?
Also, does anyone know of a good stand alone adblock? Privoxy doesn't
pick up most of the ads adblock targets.
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 7/3/09, Samuel Baldwin wrote:
> I suppose I could "cut back" a bit, but then I'd need some way of
> managing bookmarks. If this could manage bookmarks and passwords, I'd
> jump on it as my primary browser.
that's an entirely different task, don't confuse it with web page rendering
31 matches
Mail list logo
