Hi,
I've started writing a new guide/reference for wmii. It's in hg
under doc/wmii.pdf. Unfortunately, my usual proof readers think
it's written in Greek, so I'd appreciate any comments,
suggestions, or corrections from anyone interested in looking
over it.
Thanks,
--
Kris Maglione
Do not
On Sun, 24 May 2009, Wu, Yue wrote:
> Hi, I tried to make all of R[www.r-project.org] relative stuffs, like graph it
> produces by graphic device x11(), floating, the method I've tried are:
>
> { NULL, "R",NULL, 0,True },
> { NULL, "R*",NULL,
Hi, I tried to make all of R[www.r-project.org] relative stuffs, like graph it
produces by graphic device x11(), floating, the method I've tried are:
{ NULL, "R",NULL, 0,True },
{ NULL, "R*",NULL, 0,True },
{ NULL, N
> I know that Safari's developer tools are awesome, but I don't know how much
> of that is included in webkit.
>From what I've seen pop up in Arora and Midori, a lot has. Everything
from the javascript profiler and debugging to the live dom tree views,
load graphs and such. However, I don't know
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 10:30:46PM +0200, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
I hear you. firebug rocks. I will probably also keep using
FF+firebug+web developer toolbar, but just for developing/debugging/..
web pages. Eg purely as a web development tool. (unless i find
something better). Uzbl aims to be
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 01:35:18PM -0400, Benjamin Conner wrote:
>it looks cool. I will maybe test it out when I get home.
>
>On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Jacob Todd <[1]jaketodd...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
> Has anyone tried out uzbl ([2]http://uzbl.org)? Seems interesting, i
On Sat, 23 May 2009 21:48:46 +0200
"svenguc...@guckes.net" wrote:
> * Dieter Plaetinck [2009-05-23 21:41]:
> > On Sat, 23 May 2009 20:42:46 +0200
> > Sven Guckes wrote:
> > > * Dieter Plaetinck [2009-05-23 20:15]:
> > > > We may have (more or less) the keybinding ideas in
> > > > common with v
On Sat, 23 May 2009 15:26:22 -0400
Kris Maglione wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 08:48:28PM +0200, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> >> No, it doesn't. I'd be in favor of it, but it would require
> >> switching over to xulrunner and breaking compatibility with
> >> other extensions (some of which are
* Dieter Plaetinck [2009-05-23 21:41]:
> On Sat, 23 May 2009 20:42:46 +0200
> Sven Guckes wrote:
> > * Dieter Plaetinck [2009-05-23 20:15]:
> > > We may have (more or less) the keybinding ideas in
> > > common with vimperator, but that's where it stops.
> > > (unless I'm mistaken about what vimp
On Sat, 23 May 2009 20:42:46 +0200
Sven Guckes wrote:
> * Dieter Plaetinck [2009-05-23 20:15]:
> > We may have (more or less) the keybinding ideas in
> > common with vimperator, but that's where it stops.
> > (unless I'm mistaken about what vimperator does).
>
> you want a command line! http:/
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 08:48:28PM +0200, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
No, it doesn't. I'd be in favor of it, but it would require
switching over to xulrunner and breaking compatibility with
other extensions (some of which are too useful to give up).
did you mean switching away from xulrunner? fire
I like the main ideas (minimalism/vi(m) key bindings).
But the poor quality of the shell scripts (especially the shebang with
bash, sic!) and the license (gplv3) disappointed me.
[yeah, im fighting against linuxisms...]
Regards
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Jacob Todd wrote:
> Has anyone tri
* Dieter Plaetinck [2009-05-23 20:15]:
> I have only spent little time with vimperator, but unless
> I'm missing something vimperators idea is adding a vim-like
> interface to firefox (and other mozilla software).
yep.. and it makes firefox *extra* slow. :-(
> AFAIK it does not change that stora
On Sat, 23 May 2009 14:19:40 -0400
Kris Maglione wrote:
Hi Kris, thanks for your reply.
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 08:06:00PM +0200, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> >I have only spent little time with vimperator, but unless I'm missing
> >something vimperators idea is adding a vim-like interface to fir
[2009-05-23 19:42] José Manuel Pavón Álvarez
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Jacob Todd wrote:
> > Has anyone tried out uzbl (http://uzbl.org)? Seems interesting, it would
> > be nice to replace firefox with this. I plan on installing it on my
> > gentoo system later today.
>
> Looks like the
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:24:39PM +1000, Nathan Hutchison wrote:
But on the other hand, a lot of functions that you might like to have
inlined will not be, and a lot of functions will be dynamic, when in fact,
no one is using them, at all.
Statically linked libraries don't do inlining either.
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 08:06:00PM +0200, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
I have only spent little time with vimperator, but unless I'm missing
something vimperators idea is adding a vim-like interface to firefox
(and other mozilla software). AFAIK it does not change that
storage of your bookmarks, hist
On May 23, 2009, at 4:58 PM, Matthias-Christian Ott
wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 07:01:55AM -0400, Kris Maglione wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:28:47PM +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott
wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:17:18AM +0200, pancake wrote:
http://detaolb.sourceforge.net/
Ju
On Sat, 23 May 2009 19:42:31 +0200
José Manuel Pavón Álvarez wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Jacob Todd
> wrote:
> > Has anyone tried out uzbl (http://uzbl.org)? Seems interesting, it
> > would be nice to replace firefox with this. I plan on installing it
> > on my gentoo system later
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 01:53:05PM -0400, Jacob Todd wrote:
Vimperator is just an addon for firefox (what I use atm), uzbl is a
complete browser with vim like keybindings with a good rendering engine,
that leaves all configuration to the user in the form of scripts.
Yep, we talked about it on t
Vimperator is just an addon for firefox (what I use atm), uzbl is a
complete browser with vim like keybindings with a good rendering engine,
that leaves all configuration to the user in the form of scripts.
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 07:42:31PM +0200, Jos? Manuel Pav?n ?lvarez wrote:
> Looks like the
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Jacob Todd wrote:
> Has anyone tried out uzbl (http://uzbl.org)? Seems interesting, it would
> be nice to replace firefox with this. I plan on installing it on my
> gentoo system later today.
Looks like the vimperator [1] idea. I am more happy since I use
vimperat
it looks cool. I will maybe test it out when I get home.
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Jacob Todd wrote:
> Has anyone tried out uzbl (http://uzbl.org)? Seems interesting, it would
> be nice to replace firefox with this. I plan on installing it on my
> gentoo system later today.
>
>
Has anyone tried out uzbl (http://uzbl.org)? Seems interesting, it would
be nice to replace firefox with this. I plan on installing it on my
gentoo system later today.
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 07:01:55AM -0400, Kris Maglione wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:28:47PM +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
>> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:17:18AM +0200, pancake wrote:
>>> http://detaolb.sourceforge.net/
>>>
>>> Just my first time I see this minimal devel distro :)
>>
>
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:24:39PM +1000, Nathan Hutchison wrote:
> I agree with some of the points you raise Kris, imagine staticly linked KDE
> p.
>
> But on the other hand, a lot of functions that you might like to have
> inlined will not be, and a lot of functions will be dynamic, when in
Concise you are not sir.
> Gnome is better than Ktorrent anyway.
Okay, now you're not even trying. :)
Thomas
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:24:39PM +1000, Nathan Hutchison wrote:
> I agree with some of the points you raise Kris, imagine staticly linked KDE
> p.
>
> But on the other hand, a lot
I agree with some of the points you raise Kris, imagine staticly linked KDE
p.
But on the other hand, a lot of functions that you might like to have
inlined will not be, and a lot of functions will be dynamic, when in fact,
no one is using them, at all.
So I think the key is controlling what
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:28:47PM +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:17:18AM +0200, pancake wrote:
http://detaolb.sourceforge.net/
Just my first time I see this minimal devel distro :)
uClibc is by no means minimal, even though it's smaller than glibc.
In my opi
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:17:18AM +0200, pancake wrote:
> http://detaolb.sourceforge.net/
>
> Just my first time I see this minimal devel distro :)
uClibc is by no means minimal, even though it's smaller than glibc.
In my opinion a minimal system has all libraries in source code form
and statica
http://detaolb.sourceforge.net/
Just my first time I see this minimal devel distro :)
31 matches
Mail list logo
