It's a crying shame REINDEXCOLLECTION isn't documented on the
reindexing.html page :-(
I could have sworn I observed this and said something somewhere but I don't
see where.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Aug 3,
Thanks for the update, and for your work on this!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 3:17 PM Houston Putman
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Just wanted to announce that the official Solr Docker image mainte
I'm excited to see what this looks like!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 12:11 PM Jason Gerlowski
wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I spent some time last week digging into OpenAPI and spiking out how
Do other projects do that? FWIW I tailor an IDE-wide inspection profile to
my liking, tweaking what's enabled and also the severity level to reduce
red-ness when I don't think it's warranted.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmile
's okay;
it's just a suggested configuration. After all, contributors are permitted
to use whatever tooling they wish.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 8:06 AM Eric Pugh
wrote:
> I did a bit of poking
Here it is.
nts to share their intent to go, please chime in!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 4:56 PM Guse, Jimmy wrote:
> The reason I’ve been in this swamp is that I use solr from within an
> application (both via the web and in cron scripts) running only as a single
> instance on localhost, never with direct user access. To avoid having to
> deal with accounts
Thanks for volunteering!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 12:56 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> It has been long since 9.0 release and we have quit
FYI
I arranged for a Solr Birds of a Feather (BoaF) session at ApacheCon, on
Wednesday October 5th, 5:50-6:30 pm. You will see it in the Expo Pass
app. I expect it'll be relatively informal; a good time to meet 'n greet,
and make dinner arrangements with community members.
~ David Smi
I think we should have separate threads for these two topics. I'll start a
new thread for Distributed State Updates vs Overseer. If they become
related for certain points then they can be raised here?
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 11:44 AM Houston Putman wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> We've seen some i
ee), it would lead to a way to do many
changes efficiently?
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
Houston said:
> We've seen some interesting developments over the last 2 years in the way
> that Solr state and distributed logic is handled.
ow some users manage their clusters?
[1]
https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/deployment-guide/collection-management.html#rebalanceleaders
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
s would respect
preferredLeader already? If it doesn't, then the solution, I think, would
be to fix it so that it does respect it? We'll see.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 7:02 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> We ha
e probably hard-fought discoveries. I can't find
this in the Jetty one except for a one-off implementation in
LBHttp2SolrClient.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
> > > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 5:45 PM Eric Pugh <
> > > ep...@opensourceconnections.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I’m going to be there as well, along with another colleague Jeff
&g
Welcome Joshua! I'm glad you are interested.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Sat, Oct 8, 2022 at 1:41 PM Joshua Ouma wrote:
> Hello All,
> I am Joshua Ouma, an Outreachy internship applicant. It's a pleasure to b
;ve never seen/heard of
before. I think the JAX-RS conversion should have particularly good
"newdev" issues now that the infrastructure is in place.
[1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11872
"Refactor test infra to work with a managed SolrClient; ditch TestHarness"
e
been its own additional project. Ah well; there's next season for new
projects :-)
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 12:55 AM David Smiley wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> I am registered as an ASF men
ghts?
[1]
https://lists.apache.org/list?dev@solr.apache.org:2021-10:MILLER%20leader
“ZkCmdExecutor” thread with Mark Miller, and referencing
https://www.solrdev.io/leader-election-adventure.html which no longer
resolves
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.co
oudSolrClient. I think it might only be used to tell the
client to get more up to date but ideally it'd be bidirectional.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 6:34 PM David Smiley wrote:
> At work, I’
Looks like we need to downgrade the Docker image to JDK 11 :-(. Or one in
between maybe.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 4:58 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> On the users list we see several solr 9.0.0 users
Sharing for visibility.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
-- Forwarded message -
From: Jeb Nix (Jira)
Date: Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 7:11 PM
Subject: [jira] [Created] (SOLR-16455) Migrate Jira to Github Issues and
Github
aps slowly) if its use of ZK
> Watchers
> > stopped working. Today, CloudSolrClient passes _stateVer_ and it's
> parsed
> > on the server by
> > org.apache.solr.servlet.HttpSolrCall#checkStateVersionsAreValid. This
> > should be used more pervasively in m
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 6:11 AM Mark Miller wrote:
> I don’t have much to say about the proposal, other than to say that if an
> election ever ends up involving syncing up and exchanging data, doing that
> just in time is probably less than ideal for most of the more common uses
> cases.
>
I sho
And to emphasize the brilliance of ZkShardTerms (in turn, on RAFT which is
it's basis/genesis), we might not even need replica states. ZkShardTerms +
live_nodes is probably enough. Credit to Dat on this; we were just in an
email exchange about this stuff.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene
r is up to date,
certainly for RTG at least. The algorithm I listed could be changed such
that the chosen replica is informed so that it can do the needful itself.
This also acts as an implicit extra liveness check that the chosen leader
is reachable.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search
ased on my
recollection of some replay challenges with document versions & locks that
Dat & I worked on, I could see how increasing it would be helpful. There
is no cap on the number of replays happening, which I could see us wanting
to do in order to speed up how soon a replica that is already
+1 to migrate.
Yeah. Maybe Tomoko could validate the steps required? (CC'ed) Jeb listed
them in JIRA; the steps/mechanics can be discussed there while we leave
this thread as voting on the major decision.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.c
ewdev", by the way.
Eric Pugh (unaware of SOLR-8975) started pulling a thread on this sweater,
and we've been chatting a bit about it. Anyway, I'm just posting here for
general awareness of the direction we're going in with SolrJ. Changes to
SolrJ are a high touch-point f
For 9.0, a major release, a little break like this is fine (even bigger
ones!). I know I mentioned this in the release notes too
"major-changes-in-solr-9.adoc" (I see this in the commit) but somebody (!)
removed it. Ugh.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.li
Yeah I agree; no need to make a prediction on timing/versions at this point.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 10:32 AM Jason Gerlowski
wrote:
> > removing v1 completely on 10.0 should depend on how soon 1
A big THANK YOU for working on this Ishan!
Can we add regular benchmarks based on /solr/benchmark that Mark
contributed not too long ago?
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 1:39 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
Eric, the flakiness is a bug about Http2 in Jetty. But Http2 can be
disabled (thus use Http1) and we still use the Jetty client. It's
discussed on this work item in the comments:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16503
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
grade notes. I suspect this change happened when we
moved away from XPath processing of this file.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 4:21 PM Nazerke S wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I was trying to configure event listen
Vendor:
The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
Solr 6.5 to 8.11.2
Solr 9.0
Description:
Apache Calcite has a vulnerability, CVE-2022-39135, that is exploitable
in Apache Solr in SolrCloud mode. If an untrusted user can supply SQL
queries to Solr’s “/sql” handler (even in
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 12:02 PM Eric Pugh wrote:
>
> Once this is in, I'd like to tackle removing the deprecated methods on our
> various SolrClients, and if we can get that done, then those classes will
> be a lot shorter and easier to read. Is removing the deprecated methods
> something that
Thanks for sharing your analysis!
For setups where users do indexing on certain nodes and querying on other
nodes, I could imagine choosing different collectors on these nodes.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 5
all
seeing some index data path shuffling going on. ReplicationHandler etc. is
overly complex.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 1:50 PM Patson Luk wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> We are testing multiple replica setup h
I know that. The question is if a new directory is populated sourced from
the current/live directory for existing segments... OR is it populated
in-place (same directory).
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 12:37
Yeah, we want to maintain this in as few places as possible -- ideally one
place. But I think it's *adequate* albeit not ideal to have our more
pretty/user-consumably documentation refer to a raw file that a user would
have to search. We shouldn't let the ideal be the enemy of progress
Welcome Joshua! I'm looking forward to these changes coming to
fruition finally!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 7:38 AM Joshua Ouma wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'm Joshua and have been acce
Client based CloudSolrClient now holds the name that the former one
had. I wish this was more explicitly declared in the notes. Preferably,
you'd see how Jetty's HttpClient works to accomplish the same as you were
doing with Apache's HttpClient.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene
Welcome Michael!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 12:11 PM Houston Putman wrote:
> I am pleased to announce that Michael Gibney has accepted the PMC's
> invitation to join.
>
> Congratula
Thanks for volunteering!
I'd like to propose that the upgrades to dependencies due to CVEs be
back-ported to 9.1.1. I can help with this. One example I see is
woodstox-core.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022
hus going back to a vulnerable version
in main.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 8:16 AM David Smiley wrote:
> Thanks for volunteering!
>
> I'd like to propose that the upgrades to dependencies due to C
Still looking for a PR approval for the protobuf upgrade:
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1252
Makes sense -- thanks for tackling this!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 5:37 PM Justin Sweeney
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> ZkStateReader (
>
> https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/solr/solrj-zoo
post-construction for the initialization.
After Joshua converts some more tests, the PR will be ready.
Maybe EmbeddedSolrServerTestBase should be removed here as well, as it'll
do nothing other than declare this rule and a delegating method to get the
client.
After this issue, we should do an
+1. Don't add a Lucene upgrade though :-)
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 10:05 AM Michael Gibney
wrote:
> Wondering what folks think of backporting some classloading
> deadlock-related fix
()"
which I think is clear. There is a "withParallelUpdates(boolean)" right
next to that. Arguably, a pair of methods "sendUpdatesInParallel()" and
"sendUpdatesSerially()" would read more naturally.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.link
True; I have no strong preference. Sometimes we only need one side of the
boolean.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 1:26 PM Jason Gerlowski
wrote:
> +1 to "with" over "set" where it make
trace, I reported it against an existing JIRA issue that seemed pertinent:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16336?focusedCommentId=17678323&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17678323
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Devel
chart, the utilization gets to maybe 65%
quickly and then lowers down to nothing by the end of the build.
I am aware Gradle "test" isn't intelligently sharing the test load across
the workers, and that it's apparently hard for them to address this.
Do folks have ideas / recommend
not be inclusive enough by picking a
timezone convenient to me... but this doesn't stop someone from hosting a
similar event at a time convenient to them.
It'd be great to see contributors as well.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
docValues being desirable.
I wish the FieldCache was explicitly opt-in. Hossman made inroads into
this by adding a feature where you can disable it on a per-field basis but
I think we overall forgot to set this as a new default in a major release.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search
h means this may not
happen.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 11:13 AM Jason Gerlowski
wrote:
> Awesome - sounds there's definitely some general interest. (Though the
> details need some hashing out.)
>
proposal). I should also be able
to configure crave with a default run configuration with this baked in.
I'll post an update when I'm able to do that.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
n branch_9_1;
one failing test. And my old machine was unphased because it wasn't doing
the work :-). It's nice to kick off such a build in the background and be
productive doing development / whatever while it runs.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http
Looking forward to it!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 1:08 PM Anshum Gupta wrote:
> Great idea, Jason! Keeping it lightweight is going to be useful in
> organizing these.
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023
Solr tests. The answer is 96 minutes. No
failures / timeouts; it really took that long.
[1] https://github.com/apache/solr/actions/runs/4028015923/jobs/6924417956
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 5:22 PM David Smi
Woohoo!
Thanks Calvin for implementing my proposal :-)
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 11:33 AM Kevin Risden wrote:
> Thanks to Calvin Cowie and SOLR-16641 - `./gradlew localSettings` is no
> longer needed
-> ME).
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 2:31 PM Justin Sweeney
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Thank you Ishan for the announcement. I'm excited to be joining as a
> committer and continuing to be involved
Welcome Colvin!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 4:57 AM Colvin Cowie
wrote:
> Thanks everyone,
>
> I'm based in Cambridge (UK). I've been a software engineer for about 10
> years, mos
V2 shouldn't be overloaded then *that* is a problem. Can we just call the
new JAX-RS stuff V3 and then voila, we call this V3 faceting API?
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 11:42 AM Houston Putman
e it's
fine. I suspect the PRS stuff (something I haven't looked at closely) is
similar.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 11:52 AM Ilan Ginzburg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're testing SolrClo
+1 to Ishan's proposal. Make it *the* Faceting API, and rebrand the old
one to legacy or classic. The surface of the API might live on for
simple/trivial faceting; so maybe the word "classic" could be used if it
continues.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search
Thanks Houston!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 1:05 PM Houston Putman wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> It's been a while since Solr 9.1 was released, and we have a ton of great
> things t
ource
in-place, which is nicer for source control history when it returns, which
we expect it to. Of course the other way is outright removal.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
Seems like a bug to me!
Recommended reading: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6491
There's a treasure trove of information in JIRA to learn about how code
comes to be; what were the intentions behind features; what alternatives
were explored; pros & cons.
~ David Smiley
Apac
Uv,
This is a basic question but how does a new Solr contributor learn how to
install & configure the "crave" executable? I did this so long ago that I
don't remember. And it wasn't obvious to a contributor I'm working with
from his browsing of the crave.io we
I suppose all code can wait till some future big version unless it's some
sort of bug fix applicable to the present. It's just a shame that a module
I perceive to be less used, delaying things.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmile
pagination-of-results.html
On the other hand if you have only one Solr core, then maybe it doesn't
matter relative to a massive rows param.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 10:34 AM Fikavec F wrote:
>
I found this existing issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8238
I commented on it just now. Erick isn't around anymore but I'd appreciate
input from anyone using "preferredLeader".
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/d
I'm looking forward to it as well!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 9:48 AM Jason Gerlowski
wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> As we get towards the end of February it's time to start thinking
> about
I like the idea of a consolidated / organized list of dependency changes
per release in the CHANGES.txt. If it could be automated -- awesome!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 11:33 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
>
lr-to-Solr communication.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
omewhat unsatisfying that acronyms aren't cased as would be
done in a natural (non-code) written form. But such forms have space as a
delimiter, unlike code.
[1] https://google.github.io/styleguide/javaguide.html#s5-naming
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 6:23 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can you please shed some light on what problem we'll solve by doing all
> this or what motivates us to go there?
>
I suppose any of us could google such a generic question and find a bunch
of reasonable answ
bunch of work. And I suspect if we look at the tests for it (I
haven't) we'll see its testing details that may be impossible at an
integration level.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 2:44 AM Jan Høydahl wr
in Solr.
The bigger question on my mind is, can this change happen in the 9x
codeline. With fewer users/maintainers than in the past, I would prefer we
not rigidly stick to continuing to include a feature for all of 9x if we
believe it's not getting much use.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/S
/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/TimeLimitingBulkScorer.java
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
Thanks for your contributions Andy; keep'em coming!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 2:54 PM Andy Webb wrote:
> hi all, thank you for the invitation and welcome messages - this has been
> an unexpe
Fantastic!
I really appreciate you working with the community on this one.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 6:32 PM Fikavec F wrote:
> Thank you, you are very kind. I took measurements on two physical serv
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 10:44 AM Houston Putman wrote:
> The only issue I see is that the IndexSearcher timeout isn't per-query, its
> a setting on the searcher itself.
> Since timeAllowed is a query param, this seems like an issue.
> Am I reading that incorrectly?
>
Yes but we can override:
prot
BTW, I believe a rename of a file/class should *not* appear to git blame as
happening on every line. Not something you said but maybe implied and not
something I want to bring about with my proposal either.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in
FYI JIRA issue & PR: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16693
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 11:15 AM David Smiley wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 10:44 AM Houston Putman wrote:
>
>&g
e may not be so
great. Solr users want top-X documents sorted by something, and/or maybe
some facets/stats summarizing fields. Not all docs.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 5:57 PM Fikavec F wrote:
>C
fore so I'm familiar
with the mechanics of it. There is more integration work to do of course.
Ultimately Solr would have to be configured to use a custom Codec. At
work, I like to say "we've plugged all the pluggables and created our own"
LOL.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr
ow the Google Java Style Guide[1]. We don't follow all
aspects strictly; much code was written before this style guide was
selected. Some aspects of this guide are automatically enforced by the
build.
I can raise a PR where the specifics can be further debated.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucen
I've also observed that HDFS supports client provided encryption... or so I
recall when I looked many months ago. Someone ought to do a blog/write-up
on that.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 5:28 AM
something I want to kick-start).
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 5:23 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does it need to be a first party project?
>
> On Wed, 15 Mar, 202
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 5:23 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does it need to be a first party project?
>
If there is a maintainer then, I think yes. When there isn't, then it's a
difficult question.
Interestingly, the part of that test which you commented on doesn't appear
to assert/validate anything; it just does stuff.
I suspect Gus may know the answer to your question.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023
uld be
detected in some cases but that isn't a substitute for truly
working/supported.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 5:34 AM Vinayak Hegde wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I hope this email finds you
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1468
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 4:11 PM Justin Sweeney
wrote:
> +1 Could also be useful to link common IDE plugins in the dev docs to help:
> https://github.com/
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 8:39 AM Fikavec F wrote:
>I was able to create a collection with "solr.SimpleTextCodecFactory"
> codecFactory and solr can proces (return) only 2x more documents per second
> from it (214 410 documents per second vs 115 000 "solr.SchemaCodecFactory"
> with compression)
plugin
doesn't. It's fine. If you see lots of changes then tag me; I'd be
curious to see.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 2:05 PM Eric Pugh
wrote:
> Thanks for moving this along! This is a g
Ah, Solr wants a Codec*Factory* whereas you supplied the class name of the
Codec.
And of course your codec is a WIP I assume; you didn't customize the stored
fields to not use compression yet.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon
y 7 runs whereas everything else is out of
hundreds. Weird)
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
101 - 200 of 784 matches
Mail list logo
