Re: SolrJ backwards compatibility

2025-03-25 Thread Pierre Salagnac
Thanks for your inputs on this. I wasn't aware of such a strict requirement for backward compatibility. Here, there is no good reason to break compilation compatibility between the two versions. The goal was just to make the code cleaner. While it makes sense in main, I understand this should not g

Re: Policeman Jenkins => new hardware

2025-03-25 Thread Michael Sokolov
Woohoo! thanks Uwe; exciting you were able to get 2x the lifespan of the drives. Let's go for 4x this time! On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 12:53 PM Uwe Schindler wrote: > > Moin moin, > > Policeman Jenkins got new hardware yesterday - no functional changes. > > Background: The old server had some stran

Planning and Releasing Solr 10.0

2025-03-25 Thread Anshum Gupta
Hi everyone, I think it's time we start planning for Solr 10. Lucene 10 was released almost 6 months ago and it makes a lot of sense for Solr to release a corresponding version that has all the good stuff from Lucene 10. I would like to target a July release for Solr 10, giving everyone about 3 m

[Operator] [ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr Operator v0.9.1 released

2025-03-25 Thread Jason Gerlowski
The Apache Solr PMC is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Solr Operator v0.9.1. The Apache Solr Operator is a safe and easy way of managing a Solr ecosystem in Kubernetes. This release contains numerous bug fixes, and optimizations, some of which are highlighted below. The release is a

Re: [Operator] [VOTE] Release the Solr Operator v0.9.1 RC2

2025-03-25 Thread Jason Gerlowski
It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is: +1 3 (3 binding) 0 0 -1 0 This vote has PASSED! Thanks to all who voted! On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 10:50 AM Anshum Gupta wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Thanks for working on this, Jason. > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 12:53 AM Jason G