Re: Release 9.7.1

2024-10-29 Thread Jan Høydahl
Thanks Anshum. We have 11 bugs fixed for 9.8 so far, may consider backporting some of them in 9.7.1. Jan > 28. okt. 2024 kl. 18:57 skrev Anshum

Re: [JENKINS] Solr » Solr-Docker-Nightly-main - Build # 1038 - Still Failing!

2024-10-29 Thread David Smiley
Do you know what to make of this one Sanjay? On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 7:01 AM Apache Jenkins Server < jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote: > Build: > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Docker-Nightly-main/1038/ > > Log: > Started by timer > Running as SYSTEM > [EnvInject] - Loading node e

Re: Release 9.7.1

2024-10-29 Thread Gus Heck
I'm targeting 9.8 for SOLR-17151 if the rest of my life would ever stop needing immediate attention. On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 12:16 PM David Eric Pugh wrote: > Would it make more sense to do a 9.8? There are lots of CLI deprecation > in 9.8 that would be nice to see the light of day before 10.

Re: Release 9.7.1

2024-10-29 Thread David Eric Pugh
Would it make more sense to do a 9.8?   There are lots of CLI deprecation in 9.8 that would be nice to see the light of day before 10.0 is shipped!  On Tuesday, October 29, 2024 at 09:58:18 AM EDT, Jan Høydahl wrote: Thanks Anshum. We have 11 bugs fixed for 9.8

Re: [JENKINS] Solr » Solr-Docker-Nightly-main - Build # 1038 - Still Failing!

2024-10-29 Thread sanjay dutt
Not able to reproduce, Can we add a flag (info or debug) to get more logs for few days. — Sanjay > On 29-Oct-2024, at 7:21 PM, David Smiley wrote: > > Do you know what to make of this one Sanjay? > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 7:01 AM Apache Jenkins Server > mailto:jenk...@builds.apache.org>> w

Re: [JENKINS] Solr » Solr-Docker-Nightly-main - Build # 1038 - Still Failing!

2024-10-29 Thread David Smiley
Looking at the logs, I think it was a simple matter of the generated gradle.properties being outdated. I looked at it and it was definitely nothing recent. So I wiped the workspace and kicked off a new build. (just a few clicked in the UI) On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 10:45 AM sanjay dutt wrote: >