Hi Jason,
Thank you for taking care of this. I am cleaning up the post release steps
for 9.7 and this was on my to-do list.
-Anshum
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 12:48 PM Jason Gerlowski
wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Is there any reason to keep the 9.6-related jobs around in ASF Jenkins
> now that 9.7 is ou
Hey all,
Is there any reason to keep the 9.6-related jobs around in ASF Jenkins
now that 9.7 is out?
The proliferation of unneeded jobs (and the disk space they consume)
was related to our Jenkins agents going and being down for much of the
last few weeks, so I'm trying to do some cleanup where w
I'd prefer to not add a new Solr module specific interface, as you
originally proposed.
Even though we don't yet add Solr-specific Jetty modules, I think your
websocket proposal thing sounds like a nice one. Maybe Solr modules should
be converted to Jetty modules instead; I'm not sure exactly on t
Hi,
This is a known limitation, inside a dependency of Solr's:
https://github.com/locationtech/spatial4j/issues/227
But as indicated in that issue, you might be able to work-around by using
the JTS spatial context, which uses a different GeoJSON Reader. I think,
anyway; it's been a long time.
~
That's an interesting question. Some thoughts...
If you are meaning to consider using jetty's interfaces so jetty can take a
more active role in the life cycle, one key thing to consider is that
CoreContainer (or a reference that will provide it) is needed by many
things. One thing I looked at whi
Hi,
I am not sure if this is the right mailing list, but I have a problem with the
indexing of the GeoJSON. It is not exactly the configuration problem, but more
question about the implementation.
I try to index this GeoJSON document:
{
"type":"FeatureCollection",
"features":[
{
