Re: Use cases for interacting direct with ZK versus using our APIs?

2024-02-12 Thread Jason Gerlowski
> What other use cases are there for us interacting directly with ZK? Reading cluster/replica/collection properties for sure. There are some Solr APIs to modify these things, but afaik users that want to check the value of a particular (e.g.) cluster-property don't have a way to do that yet witho

Re: Use cases for interacting direct with ZK versus using our APIs?

2024-02-12 Thread Eric Pugh
Assuming an API existed, would that then be a good way? Or are there times when an API wouldn’t do what direct ZK does? > On Feb 12, 2024, at 9:13 AM, Jason Gerlowski wrote: > >> What other use cases are there for us interacting directly with ZK? > > Reading cluster/replica/collection propert

Re: [DISCUSS] Community Virtual Meetup, February 2024

2024-02-12 Thread Jason Gerlowski
I'll volunteer to organize this month! For scheduling, I'll try to stick to what Raghavan has been doing the last few months. Feels like that's worked out well for folks? Pending an objection, let's meet at 9am PT some day in the week of 2/19 - 2/23. If you have a preference, please vote for on

Re: Use cases for interacting direct with ZK versus using our APIs?

2024-02-12 Thread Jason Gerlowski
> Assuming an API existed, would that then be a good way? Yep - if there was an API, I think that'd be sufficient (for this use case at least). No reason a user would _want_ to read them out of ZK directly, afaik. On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 9:19 AM Eric Pugh wrote: > Assuming an API existed, woul

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.5.0 RC3

2024-02-12 Thread Jason Gerlowski
It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is: +1 6 (5 binding) 0 0 -1 0 This vote has PASSED. Thanks all - I'll start finalizing the release today! On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 1:57 PM David Smiley wrote: > +1 SUCCESS! [0:51:20.054401] > > BTW the first run failed due to a te

Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.5.0 RC3

2024-02-12 Thread Arrieta, Alejandro
Hello Team, Awesome news. I wrote a blog post about the procedure of testing the RC. https://www.searchistheway.com/posts/How_to_help_Apache_Solr_project_testing_Solr_9.5.RC3/ It may be included in the next RC mail if useful. Kind Regards, Alejandro Arrieta On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 11:38 AM Jason

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 9.5.0 released

2024-02-12 Thread Jason Gerlowski
The Solr PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 9.5.0. Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from the Apache Solr project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted search, dynamic clustering, database integration,

Nightly Solr Ref Guide; search is out-of-date

2024-02-12 Thread David Smiley
I went looking for the latest/nightly ref guide because I wanted to check out how something recently added but not yet released looks in the documentation. https://nightlies.apache.org/solr/draft-guides/solr-reference-guide-nightly/solr/9_6/ and I observe the UI references "9.6 beta" so seems righ

getIdField removed in Solr 9 but deprecation message in Solr 8 has no alternative specified

2024-02-12 Thread PJ Fanning
Hi, I've looked around but haven't found an answer. Apache Pekko has inherited a Solr connector from Alpakka and the code uses CloudSolrClient getIdField [1]. This field was marked as deprecated in the latest versions of Solr 8 and removed in Solr 9. I haven't found anything in the docs or on t

Re: getIdField removed in Solr 9 but deprecation message in Solr 8 has no alternative specified

2024-02-12 Thread David Smiley
Just presume the uniqueKeyField to be "id", especially in SolrCloud. If one of your users uses something different, I'd be surprised! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h

Re: getIdField removed in Solr 9 but deprecation message in Solr 8 has no alternative specified

2024-02-12 Thread PJ Fanning
Thanks David. That seems like the best approach. On 2024/02/12 23:21:26 David Smiley wrote: > Just presume the uniqueKeyField to be "id", especially in SolrCloud. > If one of your users uses something different, I'd be surprised! > > ---

Re: getIdField removed in Solr 9 but deprecation message in Solr 8 has no alternative specified

2024-02-12 Thread Gus Heck
Should our build check for @deprecated without following text describing the path forward? On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 6:26 PM PJ Fanning wrote: > Thanks David. That seems like the best approach. > > On 2024/02/12 23:21:26 David Smiley wrote: > > Just presume the uniqueKeyField to be "id", especiall

Tracking contributors uniquely

2024-02-12 Thread David Smiley
I'm working on a script to track contributors so that (A) we can track project health for ASF board report purposes and (B) we can possibly share a nice "Thank you" listing contributors in release announcements. Other purposes might crop up. GitHub's contributors report has serious shortcomings[1