What I have noticed is that CloudAuthStreamTest fails in PRS mode. So,
it passes all the time without PRS.
It needs to be fixed anyway, but I'm disabling the PRS mode for that test
On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 4:28 AM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/
LONDON) wrote:
>
> Thanks! Done.
>
> From: dev@solr
Wonderful. Please feel free to directly open a pull request or draft pull
request, or if you prefer first leave an "i'm working on this" style comment
and/or ask any questions on the JIRA issue. Thanks!
From: us...@solr.apache.org At: 01/26/24 19:34:36 UTCTo: us...@solr.apache.org
Cc: dev@solr
When I run this:
ant test -Dtestcase=CloudAuthStreamTest -Dtests.seed=F8952559841D5C83
> -Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.locale=sk
> -Dtests.timezone=Atlantic/Bermuda -Dtests.asserts=true
> -Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8 -Duse.perreplica=false
It fails. Doesn't the "-Duse.perreplica
I beasted this test a few 100 times and it was not failing. I shall
try this again (with the seed)
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 4:08 AM Houston Putman wrote:
>
> When I run this:
>
> ant test -Dtestcase=CloudAuthStreamTest -Dtests.seed=F8952559841D5C83
> > -Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtes
Thanks for calling this out more explicitly; definitelyf worth discussing.
> If a client/caller/user lists collections and then loops them to take
some action on them, it needs to be tolerant of the collection not working;
may seem to not exist.
I'd go even a step further and say that users shoul
If a program gets a list from a remote server, then expects that list to be
accurate when they make calls based on it, well, my kindest thought is
“charmingly naive”. Really, that is just bad code that hasn’t broken yet.
That is true even if it gets a list from Zookeeper. Things change while you
Yeah, I'm sympathetic to that viewpoint. I was coming at this from
Walter's -- clients must be tolerant always. This mindset is
important when working on scalable distributed systems. But depending
on clients being so tolerant leads to being less friendly --
increasing the likelihood that they w
Jason, I tackled SOLR-17068 (the one you reminded me of) and I’d love to get it
into 9.5 since right now we have a terrible mish mash of bin/solr post and
bin/post in the ref guide and docs.
Could someone review https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2227 and if it looks
good could we sneak it int
I agree with every point about the delays inherent in a distributed system,
and how any "list" call should be treated by clients as point-in-time. And
I agree that the impact _should_ be minimal since diligent clients should
have error handling in these cases anyways.
But it still feels off to me
