Hi Joel,
RE SumFloatFunction: agreed; should be "any" not "all" logic.
RE QueryDocValues: I think the current implementation is probably correct
since a default value is mandatory. That said, I could imagine using a
def(query-here, 1.0) to accomplish the same. Ugh; I see DefFunction.exists
isn'
+1 definitely
That said, I could imagine a future solrconfig.xml improvement in which the
desired Solr packages (modules?) are declared... and if so then using the
"lib" XML element seems congruent with that. But it wouldn't be to
individual JAR files! I don't love that packages are linked to co
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16507 is a bit unusual; there
are two changes/PRs by different people somewhat related with only one of
them backported to 9x; the other was forgotten (my bad). Changes.txt entry
for main branch shows this under 9.3 but hasn't been ported yet. I intend
t
Hi,
I think there is a bug in the rate limiting code inside ServletUtils [0]:
the error code is set to 429 but the 'return' is missing so the request
will continue to be processed even if the RateLimitManager returns a
'false'. From the client's side, I think the client sees 429 but the server
wil
Yup, though of course the return can't simply be added to that method, but
sendError won't stop the request, it will just cause an error when there is
an attempt to write to the response later.
