Re: [DISCUSS] Rebrand the JSON Request/Facet APIs

2023-02-17 Thread Alessandro Benedetti
In general, I dislike the V2, V3, V when rebranding a method or a service as it doesn't add any semantic value to the name, on the other hand, Json-API hints it has to do with JSON payloads. Given that, I am +1 in rebranding them, but I have no idea at the moment for a better name than what it's c

Re: [DISCUSS] Rebrand the JSON Request/Facet APIs

2023-02-17 Thread Ishan Chattopadhyaya
I'd prefer the JSON faceting API to be called just Faceting API, and the other one as Legacy Faceting API (and deprecated). The moment we deprecate it, usecases will emerge where legacy faceting is faster or more functional, and we can work on supporting those going forward. In deprecated state,

Re: [EXTERNAL] - Re: Connection to SSL enabled solr9 is failing

2023-02-17 Thread Keerthi Turakapalli
Hi, We used legacyCloudSOlrClient and still seeing issues. We want a proper fix for this SSL connection as CloudLegacySolrClient is deprecated. Please let us know other ways to fix the SSL connection issue. Thanks & Regards, ​Keerthi Turakapalli From: Jan Høydahl

Re: Shard (slice) leader replica and state.json

2023-02-17 Thread Ilan Ginzburg
Thanks Hitesh. I'm not planning a switch to PRS but to change where the shard leader status comes from. If the fix removing leader property from state.json is successful, it should be applied to the PRS implementation as well: stop tracking an attribute per replica and rely instead on the ZK leade

Re: Shard (slice) leader replica and state.json

2023-02-17 Thread David Smiley
Not saying we shouldn't have leadership in one spot, but there are down-sides. Internally, loading a DocCollection (cached consolidated representation of a Collection's total state) would require visiting ZK for each shard to get the leader. But at least it's cached so I suppose it's fine. I sus

Re: Connection to SSL enabled solr9 is failing

2023-02-17 Thread Houston Putman
I have received the same complaint (around SSL in Solr 9) from others, and think I found the root cause (we no longer allow using the default java truststore when using HTTP2). You can follow here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16668 - Houston On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 11:26 AM Jan H

[DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

2023-02-17 Thread Houston Putman
Hey everyone, It's been a while since Solr 9.1 was released, and we have a ton of great things to show off in 9.2: - Jetty 10 - JAX-RS - Lucene 9.5 I volunteer to do the release starting in the week of March 6th, unless anyone else objects or wants to do it themselves. - Houston

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

2023-02-17 Thread Ishan Chattopadhyaya
+1, thanks for volunteering. On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 11:37 PM Houston Putman wrote: > Hey everyone, > > It's been a while since Solr 9.1 was released, and we have a ton of great > things to show off in 9.2: > > - Jetty 10 > - JAX-RS > - Lucene 9.5 > > I volunteer to do the release starting in th

Re: [DISCUSS] Rebrand the JSON Request/Facet APIs

2023-02-17 Thread Mikhail Khludnev
Hello, Naming is not my favorite thing to do at all. But, if I check the guide I have: complex or nested facets Checking thesaurus gives me: grained, ingrained, deep,dwelt, dwelled, tree-ish, branched, flexible composite, compound, multiplex (multifacets? ), tangled, combined. Does anything of

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

2023-02-17 Thread Mikhail Khludnev
Thanks, Houston. Can I nominate https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1260 as a blocker for 9.2? On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 9:49 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1, thanks for volunteering. > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 11:37 PM Houston Putman > wrote: > > > Hey everyone,

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

2023-02-17 Thread Houston Putman
Wow, old JIRA! But fine by me. As long as you think it can make it in the next two weeks. To be clear, I'm not cutting the branch yet, so feel free to set blockers and make commits. I'll start the process on March 6 and we can see where we are then. - Houston On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 3:19 PM Mik

Re: [DISCUSS] Rebrand the JSON Request/Facet APIs

2023-02-17 Thread David Smiley
+1 to Ishan's proposal. Make it *the* Faceting API, and rebrand the old one to legacy or classic. The surface of the API might live on for simple/trivial faceting; so maybe the word "classic" could be used if it continues. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.co

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

2023-02-17 Thread David Smiley
Thanks Houston! ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 1:05 PM Houston Putman wrote: > Hey everyone, > > It's been a while since Solr 9.1 was released, and we have a ton of great > things to show off in 9.2: > > - Jett