Re: Understanding CLUSTERPROP APIs

2022-10-13 Thread Jason Gerlowski
Thanks Noble - so it sounds like the v2 set-obj-property API can do everything that the original action=CLUSTERPROP API can, and more? So we might be able to sunset the original API at some point? Best, Jason On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:32 PM Noble Paul wrote: > they are essentially trying to

Re: Deprecation/Backcompat for Internal+Undocumented APIs

2022-10-13 Thread Eric Pugh
Agreed…. > On Oct 12, 2022, at 11:45 PM, Noble Paul wrote: > > They are internal/undocumented APIs .IMHO we shoould not wait until 10.0 > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 6:26 AM Jason Gerlowski > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Does our normal deprecation and backcompat policy around APIs, i.e. >> de

Re: JIT Shard leader design/proposal

2022-10-13 Thread David Smiley
"JIT" is Just-In-Time; a way of looking at it. Or call it on-demand leader elections. A property of my proposal that may not be obvious is that REBALANCELEADERS would be needless since preferredLeaders would become leaders automatically on-demand (when a leader is next needed). It's not clear ho

Re: JIT Shard leader design/proposal

2022-10-13 Thread Bruno Roustant
I don't know enough how the current leader election mechanism works, yet. I miss a comparison between this proposal and the current mechanism. B. With this proposal, each time we need the leader, we check it. What is the cost of this check? Do we need to read the cluster state each time? C.1.A "S

Re: Understanding CLUSTERPROP APIs

2022-10-13 Thread Noble Paul
Yes, that's correct. And we should get rid of the V1 because it cannot do the full range of operations On Fri, Oct 14, 2022, 12:39 AM Jason Gerlowski wrote: > Thanks Noble - so it sounds like the v2 set-obj-property API can do > everything that the original action=CLUSTERPROP API can, and more?

Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.1.0

2022-10-13 Thread Jan Høydahl
On the users list we see several solr 9.0.0 users on Docker/k8s reporting frequent crashes due to a know JDK17 bug. https://lists.apache.org/thread/wg7qtkddd1t5h08okj7gm9qbrpdf0ox6 Should we perhaps provide an official solr:9.0.0-temurin11 tag as a workaround for users? And also consider releasi

Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.1.0

2022-10-13 Thread David Smiley
Looks like we need to downgrade the Docker image to JDK 11 :-(. Or one in between maybe. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 4:58 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > On the users list we see several solr 9.0.0 users on Docker

Fwd: [jira] [Created] (SOLR-16455) Migrate Jira to Github Issues and Github Projects, and migrate mailing lists to Github Discussions

2022-10-13 Thread David Smiley
Sharing for visibility. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley -- Forwarded message - From: Jeb Nix (Jira) Date: Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 7:11 PM Subject: [jira] [Created] (SOLR-16455) Migrate Jira to Github Issues and Github Proje

Re: [jira] [Created] (SOLR-16455) Migrate Jira to Github Issues and Github Projects, and migrate mailing lists to Github Discussions

2022-10-13 Thread Noble Paul
I agree that JIRA is one extra step that is not adding a lot of value. Github issues are definitely better On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 3:04 PM David Smiley wrote: > Sharing for visibility. > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > --

Re: JIT Shard leader design/proposal

2022-10-13 Thread David Smiley
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 10:28 AM Bruno Roustant wrote: > I don't know enough how the current leader election mechanism works, yet. > I miss a comparison between this proposal and the current mechanism. > > B. With this proposal, each time we need the leader, we check it. What is > the cost of thi