Re: Unit tests

15. jan. 2022 kl. 18:28 skrev Gus Heck : > > Also the efforts to reduce which tests run by default on dev laptops worries > me, it amounts to head in the sand. Are you referring to factoring out integration tests from unit tests? Or the default of running @Slow, @Nightly, @Wekly, @BadApples (do

Re: Modularizing Solr with new contrib packages

I added a developer-doc draft for modules and packages in https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/531 (HTML preview ). Let me know if it is useful. Jan > 14. jan. 2022 kl. 18:13 skr

Re: Modularizing Solr with new contrib packages

I found this a great summary! > On Jan 16, 2022, at 9:48 AM, Jan Høydahl wrote: > > I added a developer-doc draft for modules and packages in > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/531 > (HTML preview >

Re: Modularizing Solr with new contrib packages

+1 to the developer-doc, very neat. Thanks for adding it. On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 10:52 PM Eric Pugh wrote: > I found this a great summary! > > On Jan 16, 2022, at 9:48 AM, Jan Høydahl wrote: > > I added a developer-doc draft for modules and packages in > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/531

[VOTE] Stop releasing Solr binary ZIP artifact

Hi, I know that ZIP vs TGZ has been discussed before, but I'd like to propose that we ditch the Solr ZIP artifacts for the 9.0 release. Below is a plot of downloads from DLCDN last 3 months, w

Re: [VOTE] Stop releasing Solr binary ZIP artifact

+0 I have no issue with this, but would maybe like to see a discussion on the user@ list first and to hear the thoughts of our Windows users (Uwe? Steve? Shawn?) On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 1:08 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > Hi, > > I know that ZIP vs TGZ has been discussed before, but I'd like to propos

Re: [VOTE] Stop releasing Solr binary ZIP artifact

On 1/16/2022 2:58 PM, Mike Drob wrote: +0 I have no issue with this, but would maybe like to see a discussion on the user@ list first and to hear the thoughts of our Windows users (Uwe? Steve? Shawn?) +1 To say that I'm a Windows user would not quite be accurate. Every place I have actual

Re: Discuss SIP-14 Embedded Zookeeper

Yeah, there two reasons we didn’t push embedded Zookeeper out of the gate and even went so far as to call it a non production “demo” feature. Dynamic reconfiguration as a cluster changed over time, and a Zookeeper instance per Solr node being prohibitive. At least the latter was theoretical externa