Re: Solr 9.0.0 release in February

It is obviously confusing to treat 9x banch as release branch and main as both 10.0 and 9.next. I can symphatize with wanting a place to land 9.1 backports right now. If we continue with current setup and wait with cutting 9_0, committers could adapt a workflow like this * Merge your PR to main

Re: Solr 9.0.0 release in February

If we are doing a "feature freeze" for 9.0, then I think we need to cut branch_9_0. Otherwise there is going to be at least a month of features slated for 9.1 that only get committed to 10x. There are bound to be tickets/commits that fall through and don't end up on branch_9x even though they are s

Re: Solr 9.0.0 release in February

Agree. Will cut the branch tomorrow or Thursday. Current list of 9.0 blockers: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12351219 Please jump in and help with the ones you care for. PS: I found a bunch of issues assigned to the "9.0" fixVersion, I moved them all to "main (9.0)" which is the

Re: Solr 9.0.0 release in February

I completely agree with Houston; let's not create branch_9_0 yet. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 11:36 AM Houston Putman wrote: > I think its fine to start with just branch_9x until we are ready to > actually do

Re: Solr 9.0.0 release in February

I think its fine to start with just branch_9x until we are ready to actually do the release, even if it is unconventional for our processes. There’s no need to have a branch_9_0 until there are actual reasons that 9x and 9_0 would differ (i.e. 9.0.0 is ready to be released and people want to add t

Re: Solr 9.0.0 release in February

Happy New Year everyone! According to my initial mail it's now time to cut branch_9x. However, I'm in the middle of some build and build-script tuning, so it may delay a few days more. I'm also wondering whether it's better to cut both branch_9x and well as branch_9_0 so everyone can continue

Re: Solr 9.0.0 release in February

Thanks for volunteering to be the RM! No comment on the timeline; I'm in denial of the time flying. Log4shell and all that. Let's go to Lucene 9.1 and not 9.0. I'm seeing a massive change to lucene-test-framework in 9.1 on it's way that IMO ought to have been done in 9.0. Going right to 9.1 av

Solr 9.0.0 release in February

Hi, Solr's next feature release will be 9.0 (as 8x is in bugfix mode). Let's not even think about hacking an 8.12 release based on lucene-solr 8x branch. It will be ugly. The "Solr 9.0 release blockers" thread was started exact