ly this is a niche area. It might not really gain
> traction
> > unless it is marketed the right way as there are probably very few solr
> > users that happen to be thinking about revamping their saved-search
> > platform in any given year. Given that, what do you think I ca
ly gain traction
> unless it is marketed the right way as there are probably very few solr
> users that happen to be thinking about revamping their saved-search
> platform in any given year. Given that, what do you think I can do to reach
> them? :-)
> >>
> >>
dly this is a niche area. It might not really gain traction unless it
>> is marketed the right way as there are probably very few solr users that
>> happen to be thinking about revamping their saved-search platform in any
>> given year. Given that, what do you think I can do
rs that
> happen to be thinking about revamping their saved-search platform in any
> given year. Given that, what do you think I can do to reach them? :-)
>
> I am trying my best to talk about this within my firm but the sample is
> obviously smaller.
>
> From: dev@solr.apache.org A
;
>> Luwak is good to me!
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 4:01 PM Luke Kot-Zaniewski (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD
>> A) wrote:
>>>
>>> I love the name "luwak"! I was about to suggest the same but was worried
>> about the trademark concerns and I assumed
evamping their saved-search platform in any given year. Given
that, what do you think I can do to reach them? :-)
I am trying my best to talk about this within my firm but the sample is
obviously smaller.
From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 05/01/24 16:16:50 UTC-4:00To: dev@solr.apache.org
Subject: Re:
ot-Zaniewski (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD
> A) wrote:
> >
> > I love the name "luwak"! I was about to suggest the same but was worried
> about the trademark concerns and I assumed there was a reason they changed
> the name when donating it to lucene.
> >
> > From:
donating it to lucene.
>
> From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 04/30/24 15:56:22 UTC-4:00To:
> dev@solr.apache.org
> Subject: Re: solr query alerting
>
> Luwak is the original name of the Lucene monitor, contributed by Flax back in
> the days: https://github.com/flaxsearch/luwak
I love the name "luwak"! I was about to suggest the same but was worried about
the trademark concerns and I assumed there was a reason they changed the name
when donating it to lucene.
From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 04/30/24 15:56:22 UTC-4:00To: dev@solr.apache.org
Subject: Re:
from
the liquid space that encompasses them. I was also trying to think of a similar
metaphor like this but didn't get very far!
From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 04/30/24 13:26:25 UTC-4:00To: dev@solr.apache.org
Subject: Re: solr query alerting
I agree the feature is relevant / useful.
Anoth
Luwak is the original name of the Lucene monitor, contributed by Flax back in
the days: https://github.com/flaxsearch/luwak
Perhaps we could go full circle (if no trademark issues) to call it the Solr
luwak module? Luwak is a type of coffee, and thus related to percolator 😉
Otherwise “stored-qu
I agree the feature is relevant / useful.
Another angle on the module vs sandbox or wherever else is maintenance
cost. If a lot of code is being contributed as is here, then as a PMC
member I hope to get a subjective sense that folks are interested in
maintaining it. On one hand we have a number
uke
From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 04/18/24 14:54:46 UTC-4:00To: dev@solr.apache.org
Subject: Re: solr query alerting
Houston,
I really appreciate the offer to take a look. I would be happy to raise another
PR to the sandbox repo if you think that this will help get some community
usage/feedback before
the lucene-monitor optimizations while still utilizing
> solr's sophisticated index management and scaling. Lucene-monitor is a very
> sealed interface and the way it manages the index and caching (via Monitor
> interface) is not easy to integrate on its own.
> >
> > Again, I'
> solr's sophisticated index management and scaling. Lucene-monitor is a very
> sealed interface and the way it manages the index and caching (via Monitor
> interface) is not easy to integrate on its own.
> >
> > Again, I'd appreciate any feedback, even partial, that you may have
scaling. Lucene-monitor is a very sealed
> interface and the way it manages the index and caching (via Monitor
> interface) is not easy to integrate on its own.
>
> Again, I'd appreciate any feedback, even partial, that you may have!
>
> Thanks,
> Luke
>
> From: dev
ching (via Monitor interface) is not easy to
integrate on its own.
Again, I'd appreciate any feedback, even partial, that you may have!
Thanks,
Luke
From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 04/08/24 13:43:52 UTC-4:00To: dev@solr.apache.org
Subject: Re: solr query alerting
I'm so glad someone has s
I'm so glad someone has started this! Thanks for contributing. I'll
take a look
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 3:53 PM Luke Kot-Zaniewski (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD
A) wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> A few months ago I wrote the user list about potentially integrating lucene
> monitor into solr. I have raised this PR
18 matches
Mail list logo
