I merged the BadApple'ing of CollectionReloadTest, so hopefully branch_9x will
be back to green.
> On May 3, 2023, at 9:24 AM, Jan Høydahl wrote:
>
> The PR is already merged, and if it had not been for the broken
> CollectionReloadTest, branch_9x would have been fine again...
>
> Jan
>
>>
The PR is already merged, and if it had not been for the broken
CollectionReloadTest, branch_9x would have been fine again...
Jan
> 3. mai 2023 kl. 15:13 skrev David Smiley :
>
> If it's non-trivial and you're super confident, commit directly. Otherwise,
> throw up a PR (or patch) immediately
If it's non-trivial and you're super confident, commit directly.
Otherwise, throw up a PR (or patch) immediately.
I looked at your patch here. +1 from me.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 2:01 PM Eric Pugh
wrote:
What is the best way to fix this? I went into branch_9x and checked, and yeah, I totally goofed it somehow….. Can I commit the attached patch directly to branch_9x?
patch.patch
Description: Binary data
On May 2, 2023, at 3:53 AM, Jan Høydahl wrote:Last successful jenkins "check" on branch_9x w
