at 9:11 PM Walter Underwood
wrote:
> If a blog doesn't have a feed, it ain’t a blog.
>
> wunder
> Walter Underwood
> Atom Publishing Protocol Working Group
>
> > On Feb 3, 2025, at 4:01 PM, Chris Hostetter
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > : Subject: Re: V
If a blog doesn't have a feed, it ain’t a blog.
wunder
Walter Underwood
Atom Publishing Protocol Working Group
> On Feb 3, 2025, at 4:01 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
>
> : Subject: Re: Value of the Solr Blog
>
> My biggest complaint about the Solr Blog, is that
: Subject: Re: Value of the Solr Blog
My biggest complaint about the Solr Blog, is that it doesn't really *feel*
like a blog -- it's just a list pages with a single sentence summary for
each page.
The pages have no author info, not tags/categories, ... there are "dates"
Feel free to pick and choose from my back catalog of search-related blog posts.
Even some of the old ones are still relevant, like “Searchers Punt Early” and
“Do all-stopword queries matter?”
Here is that category:
https://observer.wunderwood.org/category/search-engines/page/2/
I use MarsEdit,
I have no problem with our so-called "blog" being more of an aggregation of
posts hosted elsewhere. We could rename it to better reflect this, like
maybe "the Solr Ecosystem Feed"? Not so short & sweet... but whatever.
Ultimately, I think the point is to bring more visibility across the Solr
ecos
In its current form it's more of a news feed than a blog. A blog should be
displaying the latest post by default with links/navigation to past posts.
Obviously, there's no hard rule there, but commonly the front page shows
the latest. This is also why ideally a blog post would be a full complete
us
