Re: Solr 9.4.1

Release notes: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/ReleaseNotes9_4_1 I made some small structural adjustments to the release notes. I prefer to put the CHANGES link last so that you start reading the highlights and then end with the CHANGES link for further details. Since this is a

Re: Solr 9.4.1

Done Jan > 7. jan. 2024 kl. 07:03 skrev David Smiley : > > Sure; thanks. > >> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 3:29 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: >> >> Should we include this bugfix? >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16203 >> I'm merging to branch_9x now... >> >> Jan >> 5. jan. 2024 kl. 17:

Re: Solr 9.4.1

Hi David, I think we should include SOLR-17112 as well. On some systems, the bin/solr script doesn't work properly. Regards, Ishan On Sun, 7 Jan, 2024, 11:33 am David Smiley, wrote: > Sure; thanks. > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 3:29 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > > > Should we include this bugfix? > > ht

Re: Solr 9.4.1

Sure; thanks. On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 3:29 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > Should we include this bugfix? > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16203 > I'm merging to branch_9x now... > > Jan > > > 5. jan. 2024 kl. 17:14 skrev David Smiley : > > > > 9.4.1 is unblocked; bug fixes are now on the rel

Re: Solr 9.4.1

Should we include this bugfix? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16203 I'm merging to branch_9x now... Jan > 5. jan. 2024 kl. 17:14 skrev David Smiley : > > 9.4.1 is unblocked; bug fixes are now on the release branch. I plan to > pursue a RC soon (today/tomorrow). This is my first tim

Re: Solr 9.4.1

9.4.1 is unblocked; bug fixes are now on the release branch. I plan to pursue a RC soon (today/tomorrow). This is my first time. On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 9:53 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > SolrBot had been failing for a long time (>1month), but I got it on track > again. Normally it only files new PRs

Re: Solr 9.4.1

WRT the possibility of 9.5 I think the deadlock in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17060 should be a blocker for 9.5. If others agree we can mark it for that... On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 9:55 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > SolrBot had been failing for a long time (>1month), but I got it on trac

Re: Solr 9.4.1

SolrBot had been failing for a long time (>1month), but I got it on track again. Normally it only files new PRs on Sundays, but I'm triggering that manually now to consider what other upgrades from the past month that we should put into 9.4.1. Please have a look at https://github.com/apache/sol

Re: Solr 9.4.1

I renamed that job to add "(Crave)" https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Check-9.x%20(Crave)/ and disabled it. I then I created a new job copied from the "Solr-check-main" but branch_9x. Builds are hourly so we'll see how it goes. ~ David On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 10:08 AM Jan Høydahl

Re: Solr 9.4.1

PS: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Check-9.x/ is also not running since 25 days as it was converted to Crave.. Jan > 7. des. 2023 kl. 15:06 skrev David Smiley : > > I've been working with Uv on these glitches. > ~ David > > > On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 2:47 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:

Re: Solr 9.4.1

I've been working with Uv on these glitches. ~ David On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 2:47 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > I backported ALL SolrBot PRs to branch_9_4, which brings the number of > known CVEs down. > > I also have a few other dependency upgrades baking in PRs but > unfortunately Crave has died so

Re: Solr 9.4.1

I backported ALL SolrBot PRs to branch_9_4, which brings the number of known CVEs down. I also have a few other dependency upgrades baking in PRs but unfortunately Crave has died so no PRs pass tests: > Run cd > /crave-devspaces/pipeline/runs/${GITHUB_RUN_ID}_${GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER}/solr > Selec

Re: Solr 9.4.1

Sounds good Eric. It's not clear when exactly a 9.4.1 RC will happen as there are a couple security matters we're looking at. ~ David On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 12:31 PM Eric Pugh wrote: > Something that I’d like to get released ASAP is a fix to the bin/solr post > command. > > Our Ref Guide has a

Re: Solr 9.4.1

Thanks for backporting. Remember to update JIRA FixVersion for them accordingly. ~ David On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 7:27 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > +1 > > I backported these bugfixes: > > SOLR-17039: Entropy calculation in bin/solr script fails in Docker due to > missing 'bc' cmd (janhoy) > SOLR-685

Re: Solr 9.4.1

Something that I’d like to get released ASAP is a fix to the bin/solr post command. Our Ref Guide has a lot of mentions of using “bin/solr post -c tech products”, however I removed the -c parameter in favour of -url parameter. I think that was a mistake, and would like to restore the old -c

Re: Solr 9.4.1

Good question - I'm still thinking through what makes the most sense there. Let's continue discussion on SOLR-17100 if you've got thoughts! On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 9:58 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > Jason, what do you mean by "publishing" the clients? > I suppose you don't mean pip and npm, but includ

Re: Solr 9.4.1

Jason, what do you mean by "publishing" the clients? I suppose you don't mean pip and npm, but including them in the binary tarball for users to consume? Or can we perhaps keep them "internal" only for a few releases with no docs and no guarantees, only dog-fooding? Jan > 6. des. 2023 kl. 15:38

Re: Solr 9.4.1

I'd love to see a 9.5 go out sometime in January to get our new Python and Javascript clients in front of users. I'm willing to RM the release, or share duties with you if you're interested David? Publishing the new clients will require some changes to the release process, and I'd hate to saddle

Re: Solr 9.4.1

The benefit of doing 9.4.1 now is that it won't have that unknown regression that may be lurking in branch_9x now, so it's a much easier upgrade path for 9.4.0 users. However, I feel a 9.5 should follow quickly after. There is always room for a 9.6, 9.7 etc if someone wants to promote newer feat

Re: Solr 9.4.1

Ideally I would have done a 9.4.1 earlier for that one issue... but I didn't and kept feeling more and more guilty... so here we are. But really I shouldn't feel too guilty; open-source is volunteering; doing a patch release shouldn't be a required punishment for an unfortunate bug. It wasn't eve

Re: Solr 9.4.1

On 12/5/23 16:28, David Smiley wrote: I didn't know doing 9.5 was an option. If it still is, I would prefer to do 9.5. What do people think? The 9.5.0 section of CHANGES.txt in main is not as big as that for 9.4.0, but it's not small either. I do not know whether any of those changes are s

Re: Solr 9.4.1

I didn't know doing 9.5 was an option. If it still is, I would prefer to do 9.5. What do people think? ~ David On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 7:27 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > +1 > > I backported these bugfixes: > > SOLR-17039: Entropy calculation in bin/solr script fails in Docker due to > missing 'bc'

Re: Solr 9.4.1

+1 I backported these bugfixes: SOLR-17039: Entropy calculation in bin/solr script fails in Docker due to missing 'bc' cmd (janhoy) SOLR-6853: Allow '/' characters in the text managed by Managed Resources API. (Nikita Rusetskii via Eric Pugh) (PR ) We