Re: Crave is doing well

2023-12-05 Thread David Smiley
I believe I got to the bottom of this and fixed it. The Crave server initialization script, which I wrote (at least the project/Solr specific parts) was doing a "gradle assemble" at the end, and so there's lots of compiled code & various stuff in place. For "old PRs" or some scenarios, we need a

Re: Crave is doing well

2023-10-06 Thread Jason Gerlowski
> branch_9x not being cleaned before the tests are run? That'd be my guess as well. 'CoresApi.java' is a SolrJ class that's being generated from our v2 "OpenAPI Spec" (OAS). I merged a PR a few days ago that adds the install-core-data API to our OAS (which causes us to generate code for it in Co

Re: Crave is doing well

2023-10-06 Thread Kevin Risden
At least the last few are failing with: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Check-9.x/5616/console ``` > Task :solr:solrj:compileJava /tmp/src/solr/solr/solrj/build/generated/src/main/java/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/request/CoresApi.java:20: error: cannot find symbol import org.apac

Re: Crave is doing well

2023-10-06 Thread Kevin Risden
For PRs crave might be doing ok, but branch_9x check builds are all failing for a while now? https://lists.apache.org/list?bui...@solr.apache.org:lte=1y:%22rsync%20error:%20some%20files/attrs%20were%20not%20transferred%22 Kevin Risden On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 3:38 PM Eric Pugh wrote: > Agreed

Re: Crave is doing well

2023-10-06 Thread Eric Pugh
Agreed on the branch merging. It’s been great to have it running the full set of tests! > On Oct 5, 2023, at 10:58 PM, David Smiley wrote: > > I believe the Crave issues with branch merging seem to have been fixed. If > someone sees otherwise, please let me know. > > And boy Crave is fast!