---
> From: Uwe Schindler
> Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 8:16 PM
> To: dev@solr.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Strange error in Solr with Lucene 9.0.0
>
> I was able to also reprodiuce it with TEST_JVM_ARGS=-Xint
>
> So this is not a JVM bug, it’s a real problem in Lucene
age-
> From: Robert Muir
> Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 8:13 PM
> To: d...@lucene.apache.org
> Cc: dev@solr.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Strange error in Solr with Lucene 9.0.0
>
> I'm able to reproduce this TestRandomDVFaceting one with Uwe's
> in
esday, December 8, 2021 6:44 PM
> > To: d...@lucene.apache.org
> > Cc: dev@solr.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Strange error in Solr with Lucene 9.0.0
> >
> > Uwe, it looks a little crazy:
> >
> > we've got asserts here that "index" is in bound
M
> To: d...@lucene.apache.org
> Cc: dev@solr.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Strange error in Solr with Lucene 9.0.0
>
> Uwe, it looks a little crazy:
>
> we've got asserts here that "index" is in bounds and certainly not -1
> right before the method call!
> https://github.c
Sorry, meant to add that the reproduction is before the update to lucene
9.0.0 release. But I'm also able to reproduce it after the upgrade, like
Uwe noted.
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 12:53 PM Mike Drob wrote:
> I was just able to reproduce this on my local macOS machine with
>
> gradlew test --test
I was just able to reproduce this on my local macOS machine with
gradlew test --tests TestRandomDVFaceting.testRandomFaceting
-Dtests.seed=3B93BA61C91F26D4 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.locale=uz-Latn
-Dtests.timezone=America/Santa_Isabel -Dtests.asserts=true
-Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8
on commit 028
I also generally tried to "beast" this
SimpleFacetsTest.testRangeFacetFilterVsDocValuesRandom without any
seed at all (JDK 17/linux), but I didn't manage to provoke any
failures.
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 1:08 PM Robert Muir wrote:
>
> I checked out the commit hash and re-ran the test with the same
I checked out the commit hash and re-ran the test with the same seed,
it doesn't fail. I only ran the test twice, once with
TieredStopAtLevel=1 and once without that.
Given that the stacktrace looks "impossible", i suspect this might be
an openjdk issue? I assume this test usually reproduces failu
Uwe, it looks a little crazy:
we've got asserts here that "index" is in bounds and certainly not -1
right before the method call!
https://github.com/apache/lucene/blob/main/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene90/Lucene90DocValuesProducer.java#L1123-L1125
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 12:
