Re: Moving away from Zookeeper in SolrJ

2024-12-19 Thread David Smiley
It's on our roadmap: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/Roadmap and I created an "umbrella" JIRA issue with most issues I could think of, some minor or tangential/complementary: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17605 I could create a SIP but it feels redundant. Maybe a SIP

Re: Moving away from Zookeeper in SolrJ

2024-10-25 Thread Ilan Ginzburg
The current implementation removes non live nodes from the set of nodes to connect to. Getting the live nodes requires connecting to a specific node in the cluster that is therefore live when that happens. Worst case, if there is a single node up in the cluster, the client ends with a single node i

Re: Moving away from Zookeeper in SolrJ

2024-10-25 Thread Jason Gerlowski
Hi! I'm all for (eventually) nudging folks towards HttpCSP. It's a "Good Thing", conceptually, to hide ZK! But it sounds like there are still some significant (if few) downsides to using HttpCSP (the "all live nodes disappear" case being the biggest, to my mind). IMO we should close the more sig

Re: Moving away from Zookeeper in SolrJ

2024-10-24 Thread David Smiley
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 9:07 AM Jason Gerlowski wrote: > Hi! > > I'm all for (eventually) nudging folks towards HttpCSP. It's a "Good > Thing", conceptually, to hide ZK! > > But it sounds like there are still some significant (if few) downsides > to using HttpCSP (the "all live nodes disappear"

Moving away from Zookeeper in SolrJ

2024-10-18 Thread David Smiley
I strongly believe that we need to get ZooKeeper out of our clients (that use CloudSolrClient), and use Solr URLs (HTTP) for the cluster state instead. I'm arguing to make this strategic direction clear, and we're already going in the right direction. Realistically, I don't think solrj-zookeeper