We did start using Java 17 for the 9.0 release, so we are safe there.
Since this will be overwriting existing images, it does seem a bit risky to
upgrade the base image out from under people.
- Houston
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 3:41 AM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 7/26/22 12:49, David Smiley wrote:
On 7/26/22 12:49, David Smiley wrote:
FYIhttps://github.com/docker-library/docs/pull/2162#issuecomment-1194542898
Essentially, the "openjdk" image isn't maintained anymore, and we ought to
pick an alternative. There are support implications because image
suppliers/variants have OS or other quir
FYI https://github.com/docker-library/docs/pull/2162#issuecomment-1194542898
Essentially, the "openjdk" image isn't maintained anymore, and we ought to
pick an alternative. There are support implications because image
suppliers/variants have OS or other quirks as to what is included. I
haven't r
