on Monday London time but would appreciate
> >> at least one extra pair of eyes for the change to the default logic:
> >> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3224/files
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Christine
> >>>
> >>> From:
the change to the default logic:
>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3224/files
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Christine
>>>
>>> From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 02/28/25 16:27:34 UTCTo:
>> dev@solr.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Bugfix releas
gt; >
> > Thanks,
> > Christine
> >
> > From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 02/28/25 16:27:34 UTCTo:
> dev@solr.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Bugfix release Solr 9.8.1
> >
> > Thanks to you both!
> >
> > Christine was trying to fix
> > ht
At: 02/28/25 16:27:34 UTCTo: dev@solr.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Bugfix release Solr 9.8.1
>
> Thanks to you both!
>
> Christine was trying to fix
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17686 and get it in for 8.9.1.
>
> Christine, do you think you can get this is by tuesd
Subject: Re: Bugfix release Solr 9.8.1
Thanks to you both!
Christine was trying to fix
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17686 and get it in for 8.9.1.
Christine, do you think you can get this is by tuesday next week? If so I’m
happy to wait. Otherwise, I’ll likely create an RC today
Thanks to you both!
Christine was trying to fix
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17686 and get it in for 8.9.1.
Christine, do you think you can get this is by tuesday next week? If so I’m
happy to wait. Otherwise, I’ll likely create an RC today.
- Houston
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 9:45
Sanjay and I teamed up and fixed
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17644 which has been
backported. I suppose the release is unblocked!
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 9:12 AM David Smiley wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17644 is a significant bug
> that should get into 9.8
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17644 is a significant bug that
should get into 9.8.1. We've got a PR... probably a bit drafty; a complex
problem.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 8:35 AM Jason Gerlowski
wrote:
> I just finished backporting SOLR-17677 this morning; so "all clear" on my
> end!
I just finished backporting SOLR-17677 this morning; so "all clear" on my end!
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 3:45 PM Houston Putman wrote:
>
> How are we looking on the backports for all of these?
>
> - Houston
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 3:32 PM Jason Gerlowski
> wrote:
>
> > Alright - I've put toget
How are we looking on the backports for all of these?
- Houston
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 3:32 PM Jason Gerlowski
wrote:
> Alright - I've put together a PR for SOLR-17677 that can at least
> block the problem-queries: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3203.
> Hoping I can merge this tomorrow or
Alright - I've put together a PR for SOLR-17677 that can at least
block the problem-queries: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3203.
Hoping I can merge this tomorrow or Monday, if that's alright with
folks?
Longer term we probably want to remove the reliance on
SolrIndexSearcher that causes the
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3199
Hoping to get this tiny compatibility fix into 9.8.1.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 1:25 PM Houston Putman wrote:
> Sounds good, let me know how to proceed.
>
> - Houston
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 10:44 AM Jason Gerlowski
> wrote:
>
> > I ran into a nasty li
Sounds good, let me know how to proceed.
- Houston
On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 10:44 AM Jason Gerlowski
wrote:
> I ran into a nasty little bug yesterday that I'd like to fix in 9.8.1,
> if no one minds.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17677 - DBQ's containing a
> "join" will trigger
I ran into a nasty little bug yesterday that I'd like to fix in 9.8.1,
if no one minds.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17677 - DBQ's containing a
"join" will trigger a "tragic" Lucene exception that closes the
IndexWriters and puts the surrounding SolrCore into a bad state. Will
inves
I'm done. I cherry-picked 3 bugs into 9.8.1. Tests and precommit pass.
Christos: small fixes like that -- just cherry pick them to branch_9_8 if
you wish to.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 7:00 PM Christos Malliaridis
wrote:
> The PR https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3196 contains some ref guide
>
The PR https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3196 contains some ref guide fixes.
Probably not worth mentioning in the changelog, but would not hurt
cherrypicking them in this release. :)
On 2025/02/17 21:22:56 Houston Putman wrote:
> NOTICE:
>
> I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch
Yes, as long as it's in the 9.9 release notes on main and branch_9x, they
will be removed when 9.8.1 is released.
Let me know when everything you have in mind is backported.
- Houston
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 8:41 AM David Smiley wrote:
> Thanks for doing a release Houston.
>
> There are some b
Thanks for doing a release Houston.
There are some bug-fixes we could get in here. For example the JSON enum
faceting one, prometheus, and more. I can try to move the ones I was
involved with tonight.
Am I right that we needn't change the CHANGES.txt placement on main or
branch_9x because, I re
NOTICE:
I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_9_8
Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
* Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
* All issues accepted for backporting
19 matches
Mail list logo
